You see, Jerry, it's the tmp4 that might have been or, perhaps, was and is no more :-) The comment will be changed.
Thanks for the review. Paul On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 at 17:01, Jerry D <jvdelis...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 10/30/24 9:58 AM, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 04:41:40PM +0000, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: > >> This wrinkle to PR115700 came about because the associate-name string > >> length was not being initialized, when an array selector had a substring > >> reference with non-constant start or end. This, of course, caused > >> subsequent references to fail. > >> > >> The ChangeLog provides an adequate explanation of the attached patch. > >> > >> OK for mainline and backporting to 14-branch? > >> > > > > Yes. Thanks for the patch. > > > > The comment in the test case refers to a tmp4. There is no tmp4 > referenced in the test case. > > Jerry >
