On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 12:20 AM Andrew Pinski <pins...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 6:22 PM Li Xu <xu...@eswincomputing.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: xuli <xu...@eswincomputing.com>
> >
> > When the imm operand op1=1 in the unsigned scalar sat_sub form2 below,
> > we can simplify (x != 0 ? x + ~0 : 0) to (x - x != 0), thereby eliminating
> > a branch instruction.This simplification also applies to signed integer.
> >
> > Form2:
> > T __attribute__((noinline))             \
> > sat_u_sub_imm##IMM##_##T##_fmt_2 (T x)  \
> > {                                       \
> >   return x >= (T)IMM ? x - (T)IMM : 0;  \
> > }
> >
> > Take below form 2 as example:
> > DEF_SAT_U_SUB_IMM_FMT_2(uint8_t, 1)
> >
> > Before this patch:
> > __attribute__((noinline))
> > uint8_t sat_u_sub_imm1_uint8_t_fmt_2 (uint8_t x)
> > {
> >   uint8_t _1;
> >   uint8_t _3;
> >
> >   <bb 2> [local count: 1073741824]:
> >   if (x_2(D) != 0)
> >     goto <bb 3>; [50.00%]
> >   else
> >     goto <bb 4>; [50.00%]
> >
> >   <bb 3> [local count: 536870912]:
> >   _3 = x_2(D) + 255;
> >
> >   <bb 4> [local count: 1073741824]:
> >   # _1 = PHI <x_2(D)(2), _3(3)>
> >   return _1;
> >
> > }
> >
> > Assembly code:
> > sat_u_sub_imm1_uint8_t_fmt_2:
> >         beq     a0,zero,.L2
> >         addiw   a0,a0,-1
> >         andi    a0,a0,0xff
> > .L2:
> >         ret
> >
> > After this patch:
> > __attribute__((noinline))
> > uint8_t sat_u_sub_imm1_uint8_t_fmt_2 (uint8_t x)
> > {
> >   _Bool _1;
> >   unsigned char _2;
> >   uint8_t _4;
> >
> >   <bb 2> [local count: 1073741824]:
> >   _1 = x_3(D) != 0;
> >   _2 = (unsigned char) _1;
> >   _4 = x_3(D) - _2;
> >   return _4;
> >
> > }
> >
> > Assembly code:
> > sat_u_sub_imm1_uint8_t_fmt_2:
> >         snez    a5,a0
> >         subw    a0,a0,a5
> >         andi    a0,a0,0xff
> >         ret
> >
> > The below test suites are passed for this patch:
> > 1. The rv64gcv fully regression tests.
> > 2. The x86 bootstrap tests.
> > 3. The x86 fully regression tests.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Li Xu <xu...@eswincomputing.com>
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> >         * match.pd: Simplify (x != 0 ? x + ~0 : 0) to (x - x != 0).
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >
> >         * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phi-opt-44.c: New test.
> > ---
> >  gcc/match.pd                               | 10 +++++++++
> >  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phi-opt-44.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phi-opt-45.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 62 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phi-opt-44.c
> >  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phi-opt-45.c
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
> > index 0455dfa6993..f48fd7d52ba 100644
> > --- a/gcc/match.pd
> > +++ b/gcc/match.pd
> > @@ -3383,6 +3383,16 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
> >    }
> >    (if (wi::eq_p (sum, wi::uhwi (0, precision)))))))
> >
> > +/* The boundary condition for case 10: IMM = 1:
> > +   SAT_U_SUB = X >= IMM ? (X - IMM) : 0.
> > +   simplify (X != 0 ? X + ~0 : 0) to (X - X != 0).  */
> > +(simplify
> > + (cond (ne@1 @0 integer_zerop)
> > +       (nop_convert? (plus (nop_convert? @0) integer_all_onesp))
> > +       integer_zerop)
> > + (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type))
> > +   (minus @0 (convert @1))))
>
> This looks good to me, though I can't approve it.

OK.

Thanks,
Richard.

> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
> > +
> >  /* Signed saturation sub, case 1:
> >     T minus = (T)((UT)X - (UT)Y);
> >     SAT_S_SUB = (X ^ Y) & (X ^ minus) < 0 ? (-(T)(X < 0) ^ MAX) : minus;
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phi-opt-44.c 
> > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phi-opt-44.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000000..962bf0954f6
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phi-opt-44.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-phiopt1" } */
> > +
> > +#include <stdint.h>
> > +
> > +uint8_t f1 (uint8_t x)
> > +{
> > +  return x >= (uint8_t)1 ? x - (uint8_t)1 : 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +uint16_t f2 (uint16_t x)
> > +{
> > +  return x >= (uint16_t)1 ? x - (uint16_t)1 : 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +uint32_t f3 (uint32_t x)
> > +{
> > +  return x >= (uint32_t)1 ? x - (uint32_t)1 : 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +uint64_t f4 (uint64_t x)
> > +{
> > +  return x >= (uint64_t)1 ? x - (uint64_t)1 : 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "goto" "phiopt1" } } */
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phi-opt-45.c 
> > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phi-opt-45.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000000..62a2ab63184
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phi-opt-45.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-phiopt1" } */
> > +
> > +#include <stdint.h>
> > +
> > +int8_t f1 (int8_t x)
> > +{
> > +  return x != 0 ? x - (int8_t)1 : 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int16_t f2 (int16_t x)
> > +{
> > +  return x != 0 ? x - (int16_t)1 : 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int32_t f3 (int32_t x)
> > +{
> > +  return x != 0 ? x - (int32_t)1 : 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int64_t f4 (int64_t x)
> > +{
> > +  return x != 0 ? x - (int64_t)1 : 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "goto" "phiopt1" } } */
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >

Reply via email to