On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 at 15:45, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> These tests check `_GLIBCXX_DOUBLE_IS_IEEE_BINARY128` but that's never
> defined, it should be "LDOUBLE" not "DOUBLE".
>
> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>
>         * testsuite/26_numerics/complex/ext_c++23.cc: Fix typo in macro.
>         * testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/constexpr_std_c++23.cc:
>         Likewise.
>         * testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/functions_std_c++23.cc:
>         Likewise.
>         * testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/nextafter_c++23.cc:
>         Likewise.
> ---
> This first patch is an obvious fix for a typo, but tests still pass
> after fixing it, which is reassuring!
>
> I'll push it shortly.

PATCH 1/3 is now pushed. The patch series is also available at
https://forge.sourceware.org/gcc/gcc-TEST/pulls/6/files


>
> Tested powerpc64le-linux.
>
>  libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/complex/ext_c++23.cc         | 2 +-
>  .../testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/constexpr_std_c++23.cc  | 2 +-
>  .../testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/functions_std_c++23.cc  | 2 +-
>  .../testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/nextafter_c++23.cc      | 2 +-
>  4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/complex/ext_c++23.cc 
> b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/complex/ext_c++23.cc
> index 0fc3d6f1a66..5f4ff06448e 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/complex/ext_c++23.cc
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/complex/ext_c++23.cc
> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ main()
>    }
>  #endif
>  #if defined(__STDCPP_FLOAT128_T__) \
> -    && (defined(_GLIBCXX_DOUBLE_IS_IEEE_BINARY128) \
> +    && (defined(_GLIBCXX_LDOUBLE_IS_IEEE_BINARY128) \
>         || defined(_GLIBCXX_HAVE_FLOAT128_MATH))
>    {
>      std::float128_t p[2] = {};
> diff --git 
> a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/constexpr_std_c++23.cc 
> b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/constexpr_std_c++23.cc
> index 3c2377fd698..983027ff654 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/constexpr_std_c++23.cc
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/constexpr_std_c++23.cc
> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ main()
>    test_functions<std::float64_t>();
>  #endif
>  #if defined(__STDCPP_FLOAT128_T__) \
> -    && (defined(_GLIBCXX_DOUBLE_IS_IEEE_BINARY128) \
> +    && (defined(_GLIBCXX_LDOUBLE_IS_IEEE_BINARY128) \
>         || defined(_GLIBCXX_HAVE_FLOAT128_MATH))
>    test_functions<std::float128_t>();
>  #endif
> diff --git 
> a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/functions_std_c++23.cc 
> b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/functions_std_c++23.cc
> index ea68ac5da75..bf07493ecd4 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/functions_std_c++23.cc
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/functions_std_c++23.cc
> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ main()
>    }
>  #endif
>  #if defined(__STDCPP_FLOAT128_T__) \
> -    && (defined(_GLIBCXX_DOUBLE_IS_IEEE_BINARY128) \
> +    && (defined(_GLIBCXX_LDOUBLE_IS_IEEE_BINARY128) \
>         || defined(_GLIBCXX_HAVE_FLOAT128_MATH))
>    {
>      std::float128_t p[128] = {};
> diff --git 
> a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/nextafter_c++23.cc 
> b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/nextafter_c++23.cc
> index 91767d22cc3..2d0f8017f4a 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/nextafter_c++23.cc
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/nextafter_c++23.cc
> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ main ()
>    test <std::float64_t>();
>  #endif
>  #if defined(__STDCPP_FLOAT128_T__) \
> -    && (defined(_GLIBCXX_DOUBLE_IS_IEEE_BINARY128) \
> +    && (defined(_GLIBCXX_LDOUBLE_IS_IEEE_BINARY128) \
>         || defined(_GLIBCXX_HAVE_FLOAT128_MATH))
>    test <std::float128_t>();
>  #endif
> --
> 2.47.0
>

Reply via email to