Hi Gerald, As it becomes our long term goal to deliver arm-none-eabi tool chain based on GCC 4.6/4.7/4.8 and future branches, I am going to use the following pattern to document this branch family. Is it ok to commit?
BR, Terry Index: htdocs/svn.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/svn.html,v retrieving revision 1.174 diff -u -r1.174 svn.html --- htdocs/svn.html 8 Jun 2012 10:39:57 -0000 1.174 +++ htdocs/svn.html 6 Jul 2012 06:01:05 -0000 @@ -523,14 +523,13 @@ coordinate work with others. This branch is maintained by the folks at Apple. Previous branch was apple-ppc-branch.</dd> - <dt>ARM/embedded-4_6-branch</dt> - <dd>This branch provides bug-fixes, minor enhancements and stability - fixes for GCC 4.6.x when used with ARM's embedded cores, such as - the Cortex-R and Cortex-M processors. It will sync with upstream - GCC 4.6 branch regularly. Most patches will be back-ports of changes - already made on trunk. Patches should be marked with the - tag <code>[arm-embedded]</code> in the subject line. The branch is - maintained by personnel from ARM.</dd> + <dt>ARM/embedded-<em>x_y</em>-branch</dt> + <dd>These branches provide bug-fixes, minor enhancements and stability + fixes for GCC <em>x.y</em> branches when used with ARM's embedded cores, + such as the Cortex-R and Cortex-M processors. Most patches will be + back-ports of changes already made on trunk. Patches should be marked + with the tag <code>[arm-embedded]</code> in the subject line. This family + of branches is maintained by personnel from ARM.</dd> <dt>csl-3_3_1-branch</dt> <dd>CodeSourcery release based on GCC 3.3.1.</dd>
