We ICE upon the following invalid code because we end up calling finalize_nrv_r with a RETURN_EXPR with no operand.
=== cut here === struct X { ~X(); }; X test(bool b) { { X x; return x; } if (!(b)) return; } === cut here === This patch fixes this by simply returning error_mark_node when detecting a void return in a function returning non-void. Successfully tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. PR c++/117099 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * typeck.cc (check_return_expr): Return error_mark_node upon void return for function returning non-void. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/parse/crash77.C: New test. --- gcc/cp/typeck.cc | 1 + gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/crash77.C | 14 ++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/crash77.C diff --git a/gcc/cp/typeck.cc b/gcc/cp/typeck.cc index 71d879abef1..22a6ec9a185 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/typeck.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/typeck.cc @@ -11238,6 +11238,7 @@ check_return_expr (tree retval, bool *no_warning, bool *dangling) RETURN_EXPR to avoid control reaches end of non-void function warnings in tree-cfg.cc. */ *no_warning = true; + return error_mark_node; } /* Check for a return statement with a value in a function that isn't supposed to return a value. */ diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/crash77.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/crash77.C new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d3f0ae6a877 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/crash77.C @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +// PR c++/117099 +// { dg-compile } + +struct X { + ~X(); +}; + +X test(bool b) { + { + X x; + return x; + } + if (!(b)) return; // { dg-error "return-statement with no value" } +} -- 2.44.0