On Wed, 9 Oct 2024, Frank Scheiner wrote: > On 09.10.24 10:26, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Oct 2024, Richard Biener wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 8 Oct 2024, Frank Scheiner wrote: > >> > >>> With stage 3 of GCC 15 approaching, to save me some time by finally > >>> dropping the non-LRA testcase from my cross builds of GCC and Linux and > >>> as I had the time, I updated the patch set from René with the requested > >>> changes and rebased it to 0ad2c76bea20dbeac753f10df6f9f86d142348d4. > >>> > >>> Patch 1/2: Remove ia64*-*-linux from the list of obsolete targets > >>> Patch 2/2: Enable LRA for ia64 > >>> > >>> LRA functionality was tested by bootstrapping GCC natively and running > >>> the testsuite on ia64 based on > >>> 236116068151bbc72aaaf53d0f223fe06f7e3bac: > >>> > >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2024-June/817268.html > >>> > >>> For comparison, the same with just > >>> 236116068151bbc72aaaf53d0f223fe06f7e3bac: > >>> > >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2024-June/817267.html > >>> > >>> A diff between them is attached. > >>> > >>> Can this be brought forward now as is? > >> > >> I'll push this for you. > > > > I spoke too fast - something between you and me corrupts the patch > > so it doesn't apply (even after manually resolving line-wrapping, > > I suspect whitespace is also broken). Can you re-send them as > > attachments please? > > Is it OK to attach them to my reply here or better with a v4? > > If the latter, should the patches be attached to the cover letter and the > numbering in the subject be removed then, as everything is included in one > email?
The attachments worked fine, I pushed them Richard.
