On Tue, 8 Oct 2024, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > > I have plenty of concerns with > > both the wording and incompatibility of various changes suggested there > > related to what's allowed as a sizeof operand and associated semantics but > > I don't think there were any concerns in that discussion about the use of > > the term "length". > > Now you've seen mine. I will oppose to n3187 as much as I can, as long > as it offers length as the term.
It's "size", not "length", that has been used more inconsistently. Take for example this sentence from K&R2 (I don't have K&R1), section 4.9 (Initialization): "When the size of the array is omitted, the compiler will compute the length by counting the initializers, of which there are 12 in this case.". Length of strings is simply array length of a sub-array that doesn't include the terminating null character (a case of the sub-object issue of exactly what object is relevant in what context, not anything to do with the term "length"). -- Joseph S. Myers josmy...@redhat.com
