Hi!

On Mon, 8 Jul 2024 at 10:57, Siarhei Volkau <lis8...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ping
>
> чт, 20 июн. 2024 г. в 12:09, Siarhei Volkau <lis8...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > This patch deals with consequences but not the root cause though.
> >
> > There are 5 cases which are subjects to rewrite:
> > case #1:
> >   mov ip, r1
> >   add r2, ip
> >   # ip is dead here
> > can be rewritten as:
> >   adds r2, r1

Why replace 'add' with 'adds' ?

Thanks,

Christophe

> >
> > case #2:
> >   add ip, r1
> >   mov r1, ip
> >   # ip is dead here
> > can be rewritten as:
> >   add r1, ip
> >
> > case #3:
> >   mov ip, r1
> >   add r2, ip
> >   add r3, ip
> >   # ip is dead here
> > can be rewritten as:
> >   adds r2, r1
> >   adds r3, r1
> >
> > case #4:
> >   mov ip, r1
> >   add ip, r2
> >   mov r1, ip
> > can be rewritten as:
> >   adds r1, r2
> >   mov  ip, r1 <- might be eliminated too, if ip is dead
> >
> > case #5 (arbitrary):
> >   mov  r1, ip
> >   subs r2, r1, r2
> >   mov  ip, r2
> >   # r1 is dead here
> > can be rewritten as:
> >   rsbs r1, r2, #0
> >   add  ip, r1
> >   movs r2, ip <- might be eliminated, if r2 is dead
> >
> > Speed profit wasn't checked but size changes are the following:
> >    libgcc:  -132 bytes / -0.25%
> >      libc: -1262 bytes / -0.55%
> >      libm:  -384 bytes / -0.42%
> > libstdc++: -2258 bytes / -0.30%
> >
> > No tests provided because its hard to force GCC to emit HI_REGS
> > in a small and straightforward function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Siarhei Volkau <lis8...@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  gcc/config/arm/thumb1.md | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 92 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/thumb1.md b/gcc/config/arm/thumb1.md
> > index d7074b43f60..9da4af9eccd 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/arm/thumb1.md
> > +++ b/gcc/config/arm/thumb1.md
> > @@ -2055,4 +2055,95 @@ (define_insn "thumb1_stack_protect_test_insn"
> >     (set_attr "conds" "clob")
> >     (set_attr "type" "multiple")]
> >  )
> > -
> > +
> > +;; bad code emitted when HI_REGS involved in addition
> > +;; subtract also might happen rarely
> > +
> > +;; case #1:
> > +;; mov ip, r1
> > +;; add r2, ip # ip is dead after that
> > +(define_peephole2
> > +  [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "")
> > +       (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" ""))
> > +   (set (match_operand:SI 2 "register_operand" "")
> > +       (plus:SI (match_dup 2) (match_dup 0)))]
> > +  "TARGET_THUMB1
> > +    && peep2_reg_dead_p (2, operands[0])
> > +    && REGNO_REG_CLASS (REGNO (operands[0])) == HI_REGS"
> > +  [(set (match_dup 2)
> > +       (plus:SI (match_dup 2) (match_dup 1)))]
> > +  "")
> > +
> > +;; case #2:
> > +;; add ip, r1
> > +;; mov r1, ip # ip is dead after that
> > +(define_peephole2
> > +  [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "")
> > +       (plus:SI (match_dup 0) (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "")))
> > +   (set (match_dup 1) (match_dup 0))]
> > +  "TARGET_THUMB1
> > +    && peep2_reg_dead_p (2, operands[0])
> > +    && REGNO_REG_CLASS (REGNO (operands[0])) == HI_REGS"
> > +  [(set (match_dup 1)
> > +       (plus:SI (match_dup 1) (match_dup 0)))]
> > +  "")
> > +
> > +;; case #3:
> > +;; mov ip, r1
> > +;; add r2, ip
> > +;; add r3, ip # ip is dead after that
> > +(define_peephole2
> > +  [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "")
> > +       (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" ""))
> > +   (set (match_operand:SI 2 "register_operand" "")
> > +       (plus:SI (match_dup 2) (match_dup 0)))
> > +   (set (match_operand:SI 3 "register_operand" "")
> > +       (plus:SI (match_dup 3) (match_dup 0)))]
> > +  "TARGET_THUMB1
> > +    && peep2_reg_dead_p (3, operands[0])
> > +    && REGNO_REG_CLASS (REGNO (operands[0])) == HI_REGS"
> > +  [(set (match_dup 2)
> > +       (plus:SI (match_dup 2) (match_dup 1)))
> > +   (set (match_dup 3)
> > +       (plus:SI (match_dup 3) (match_dup 1)))]
> > +  "")
> > +
> > +;; case #4:
> > +;; mov ip, r1
> > +;; add ip, r2
> > +;; mov r1, ip
> > +(define_peephole2
> > +  [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "")
> > +       (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" ""))
> > +   (set (match_dup 0)
> > +       (plus:SI (match_dup 0) (match_operand:SI 2 "register_operand" "")))
> > +   (set (match_dup 1)
> > +       (match_dup 0))]
> > +  "TARGET_THUMB1
> > +    && REGNO_REG_CLASS (REGNO (operands[0])) == HI_REGS"
> > +  [(set (match_dup 1)
> > +       (plus:SI (match_dup 1) (match_dup 2)))
> > +   (set (match_dup 0) (match_dup 1))]  ;; likely will be eliminated
> > +  "")
> > +
> > +;; case #5:
> > +;; mov  r1, ip
> > +;; subs r2, r1, r2
> > +;; mov  ip, r2      # r1 is dead after
> > +(define_peephole2
> > +  [(set (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "")
> > +       (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" ""))
> > +   (set (match_operand:SI 2 "register_operand" "")
> > +        (minus:SI (match_dup 1) (match_dup 2)))
> > +   (set (match_dup 0)
> > +       (match_dup 2))]
> > +  "TARGET_THUMB1
> > +    && peep2_reg_dead_p (3, operands[1])
> > +    && REGNO_REG_CLASS (REGNO (operands[0])) == HI_REGS"
> > +  [(set (match_dup 1)
> > +       (neg:SI (match_dup 2)))
> > +   (set (match_dup 0)
> > +        (plus:SI (match_dup 0) (match_dup 1)))
> > +   (set (match_dup 2)                  ;; likely will be eliminated
> > +        (match_dup 0))]
> > +  "")
> > --
> > 2.45.2
> >

Reply via email to