On Sep 30, 2024, at 14:18, Kito Cheng <kito.ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Yang-Yu
> 
> Yeah, I was planning to send another version to update the interface
> to the latest, but I'm just too busy (too lazy?) to update, anyway
> will send new revision soon,
> 
> However...one of our folk are also working on
> target_clone/target_versions, not sure what your current status is?
> Maybe we can collaborate on that?

My current status is have some basic implementation of some functions
including:
- TARGET_OPTION_FUNCTION_VERSIONS
- TARGET_COMPARE_VERSION_PRIORITY
- TARGET_GENERATE_VERSION_DISPATCHER_BODY
- TARGET_GET_FUNCTION_VERSIONS_DISPATCHER
- TARGET_MANGLE_DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME

And generated a very simple code with some manual effort.

I’m glad to see you have a folk working on target_clone/target_versions.
I think we can collaborate on that.

I am doing a research project that relies on target_clone support
on RISC-V, so I want a working target_clone GCC to work and want
to devote my time to it.

Thanks,
Yangyu Chen

> 
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 11:20 PM Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 9/29/24 3:16 AM, Yangyu Chen wrote:
>>> Good job. I'm currently working on RISC-V target_clone and
>>> target_versions support in GCC and found this patch is needed as my
>>> prerequisite.
>>> 
>>> However, I found this tagged as "dropped" on Patchwork. What happened?
>> I think Kito was going to revamp this stuff IIRC.
>> 
>> jeff

Reply via email to