On Mon, 23 Sep 2024, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> Hi, HP -
>
> > I'd love for (something like) gcc-testresults@ to be usefully
> > searchable (it can be done but... lacks), so please allow me:
>
> Certainly!
>
> > > +: ${bunsengit=ssh://sourceware.org/git/bunsendb.git/};
> > > +: ${bunsentag=`whoami`/gcc/`uname -m`-`date +%Y%m%d-%H%M`};
> >
> > That uname -m looks like it's an assumption that the report is
> > for a 1) native build that is 2) the same machine as where the
> > git push should happen and 3) all run the same OS. Also, my
> > local account-name may be completely different than what's
> > needed in the tag. Looks like there's a side-question for
> > account names for the bunsendb when you don't have a sourceware
> > account (are rules needed)? Anyway, please parametrize. [...]
>
> OK, the shell script is parametrized more.
> wdyt about this version?
Regarding functionality, perfect enough AFAICT. I was going to
make a nitpick comment about comments with full sentences and
all that GNU...but better be consistent with the rest of the
file. Thanks!
brgds, H-P
