On 9/23/24 11:21 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Here's a general approach to handle PR116701. I considered
adding manual deletions as quoted below and mentioned in the
PR, but seeing the handling of "integer 8" in
fortran-torture-execute I decided to follow that example:
better scan the source for open-statements than relying on
manual annotations and people remembering to add them for
new test-cases.
I hope the inclusion of gfortran-dg.exp in
fortran-torture.exp is not controversial, but there's no
fortran-specific testsuite file common to dg and
classic-torture and also this placement is still in the
"Utility routines" section of gfortran-dg.exp. (BTW, the C
torture-tests changed to the dg framework some time ago - no
more .x-files there and dg-directives actually work - there
are some in gfortran.fortran-torture that are apparently
ignored!)
Explain this change of including gfortran-dg.exp in fortran-torture.exp.
What does it mean in the case I do 'make -k -j4 check-fortran'? Does
gfortran-dg-exp get performed twice? Forgive my ignorance of the
testsuite incantations.
Regards,
Jerry
