In this case, they were all harmless in reality (no diff in test logs).
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-array-1.c: Fix dg-do directive syntax.
* gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-bitfields-1.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-bitfields-2.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-union-1.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-anonymous-struct-1.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-anonymous-union-1.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-1.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-2.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-4.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-5.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-6.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-attr-mode-1.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-attr-used-1.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-1.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-2.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-3.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-4.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-complex-1.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-1.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-2.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-3.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-4.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-enum-1.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-enum-2.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-file-scope-1.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-float-1.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-forward-1.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-forward-2.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-func-index-1.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-1.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-2.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-3.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-4.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-functions-1.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-int-1.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-objt-index-1.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-pointers-1.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-pointers-2.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-preamble-1.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-str-table-1.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-1.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-2.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-array-1.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-array-2.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-1.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-2.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-3.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-1.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-2.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-3.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-union-1.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-1.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-2.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-3.c: Ditto.
---
Pushed as obvious.
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-array-1.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-bitfields-1.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-bitfields-2.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c | 3 ++-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-union-1.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-anonymous-struct-1.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-anonymous-union-1.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-1.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-2.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-4.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-5.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-6.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-attr-mode-1.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-attr-used-1.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-1.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-2.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-3.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-4.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-complex-1.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-1.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-2.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-3.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-4.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-enum-1.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-enum-2.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-file-scope-1.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-float-1.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-forward-1.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-forward-2.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-func-index-1.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-1.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-2.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-3.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-4.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-functions-1.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-int-1.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-objt-index-1.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-pointers-1.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-pointers-2.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-preamble-1.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-str-table-1.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-1.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-2.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-array-1.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-array-2.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-1.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-2.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-3.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-1.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-2.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-3.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-union-1.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-1.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-2.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-3.c | 2 +-
55 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-array-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-array-1.c
index 967b1e8746a2..51ec99123521 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-array-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-array-1.c
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
a1 : cta_nelems = 2, 5
buf : cta_nelems = 0. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x3000000\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*btt_info" 5 } }
*/
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-bitfields-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-bitfields-1.c
index 793b4c8db825..cc15833d3afc 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-bitfields-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-bitfields-1.c
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
- (0x13 << 24) | 0x40 - note that this is aligned to 0x40.
- (0x13 << 24) | 0x31 - in case structures are packed. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA" } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target int32plus } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-bitfields-2.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-bitfields-2.c
index 2ec00dc6796e..1f525173d5ef 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-bitfields-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-bitfields-2.c
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
We expect a struct with 2 members to be generated. The size 0 bitfield
should not have any entry in the member list. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA" } */
/* Struct with bitfield members, and 2 members. */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c
index 15b762592182..781f80774e2f 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+
/* BTF generation of BTF_KIND_DATASEC records.
We expect 3 DATASEC records: one for each of .data, .rodata and .bss.
@@ -9,7 +10,7 @@
so we cannot check them.
*/
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA" } */
/* { dg-additional-options "-msdata=none" { target { { powerpc*-*-* } && ilp32
} } } */
/* { dg-additional-options "-msmall-data-limit=0" { target { riscv*-*-* } } }
*/
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-union-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-union-1.c
index e3a19028843b..9838dc236d23 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-union-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-union-1.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
/* Test BTF generation for union type. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA" } */
/* One union type with 4 members */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-anonymous-struct-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-anonymous-struct-1.c
index 93547d458186..807e0a4be633 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-anonymous-struct-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-anonymous-struct-1.c
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
struct a : ctt_info = 0x1a000002 (2 fields)
struct {} : ctt_info = 0x1a000001 (1 field) */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_name" 1 } }
*/
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-anonymous-union-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-anonymous-union-1.c
index f45af9b742d4..382ecbd98945 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-anonymous-union-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-anonymous-union-1.c
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
struct anon_union : ctt_info = 0x1a000001 (1 field)
union {} : ctt_info = 0x1e000002 (2 fields) */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_name" 1 } }
*/
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-1.c
index 006a7582f0b6..d50da97c32ba 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-1.c
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
a1 : cta_nelems = 2, 5
buf : cta_nelems = 0. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x12000000\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 5 }
} */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-2.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-2.c
index 4721c4fb2f97..8bceb7a83773 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-2.c
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
In this testcase, two CTF array records each of type int [0] is expected.
*/
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x12000000\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 2 }
} */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-4.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-4.c
index 013a8ff98d7f..86c57dcf09e2 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-4.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-4.c
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Test CTF generation for single element arrays. In this testcase, one CTF
record for array is expected with cta_nelems = 1. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x12000000\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 }
} */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-5.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-5.c
index ec504412ef56..f635a2cd01c0 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-5.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-5.c
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
*/
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x12000000\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 }
} */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-6.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-6.c
index 5564cb8865db..211d9c60e59f 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-6.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-6.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
/* CTF generation for multidimensional array. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]+0x2\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*cta_nelems" 1
} } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-attr-mode-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-attr-mode-1.c
index c4801a726d28..2cb77da7f3d3 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-attr-mode-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-attr-mode-1.c
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
variable refers to a specific CTF type, so this testcase merely asserts
for existence of individual CTF records. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"B1.0\"\[\t
\]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-attr-used-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-attr-used-1.c
index 61f6b6410dee..b40d92d670b2 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-attr-used-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-attr-used-1.c
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
This attribute, attached to a function, means that code must be emitted for
the function even if it appears that the function is not referenced. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -gctf -dA" } */
/* These should be true for higher optimization levels. */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-1.c
index 1deac90f256f..f12adeb1cb20 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-1.c
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
In this testcase, two slices are expected - one for enum and the other for
int. CTF slices are unnamed records. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x2\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*cts_bits" 1 }
} */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-2.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-2.c
index aea09219dba6..0a911b43049a 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-2.c
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
across targets with different BIT_PER_WORD. Is there a way to add
cts_offset related checks in the testcase? */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x6\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*cts_type" 3 }
} */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-3.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-3.c
index 8fbcf122f80f..411040db88fd 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-3.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
/* The bool bitfield type. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x2\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*cts_type" 2 }
} */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-4.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-4.c
index 012069ac9181..c03ffb7d5af4 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-4.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-4.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
In this testcase, two slices are expected. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x2\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*cts_type" 2 }
} */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-complex-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-complex-1.c
index e6c3199f913d..ff106fef9dcc 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-complex-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-complex-1.c
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
This testcase has a mix of C constructs containing COMPLEX_TYPE. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target libc_has_complex_functions } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-1.c
index 0137e9d45c5f..919e5b3f6775 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-1.c
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
10: void (*) (size_t, int *restrict, const int *restrict) (size 0x0)
*/
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -gdwarf-4 -dA" { target { *-*-darwin* } } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-2.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-2.c
index 4f328f3a5ac0..5f1ca55c6a74 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-2.c
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
two const qualifier CTF records are expected (const int and const struct
s1). */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"int.0\"\[\t
\]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-3.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-3.c
index 97317a47b8f5..b18c43eec45e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-3.c
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
In this testcase, it is expected to have const and volatile CTF
records. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"unsigned char.0\"\[\t
\]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-4.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-4.c
index c1633ee935d2..a3984e030051 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-4.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-4.c
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
is 1 const qualifier. 1 more no-name CTF record corresponds to the CTF
pointer record. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_name" 2 } }
*/
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-enum-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-enum-1.c
index 969354431ba4..16abbed1cac9 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-enum-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-enum-1.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
/* CTF generation for enums. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"RED.0\"\[\t
\]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-enum-2.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-enum-2.c
index fd8aaeced84a..b40bcaf650f5 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-enum-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-enum-2.c
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
In this testcase, CTF for enumerator GFS_MONOTONIC will not be generated.
*/
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"GFS_MONOTONIC.0\"\[\t
\]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 0 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-file-scope-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-file-scope-1.c
index ddfb31da4056..e58fb54dcad8 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-file-scope-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-file-scope-1.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
/* CTF is not generated for entities not at file-scope. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"SFOO.0\"\[\t
\]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 0 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-float-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-float-1.c
index 9e24b450ea5c..ddf4230acc1c 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-float-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-float-1.c
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
/* Tests for CTF float base types.
- Verify that there is a single record for the base types. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"float.0\"\[\t
\]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"double.0\"\[\t
\]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-forward-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-forward-1.c
index fdec74332883..90f2015cb0c0 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-forward-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-forward-1.c
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
type. The second assembler tag is due to a ref type in a CVR CTF record.
TBD - perhaps a more robust string pattern is needed. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x26000000\[\t
\]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 2 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-forward-2.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-forward-2.c
index a3154f2b2d40..a10b75b220b4 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-forward-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-forward-2.c
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
For forward types, the compiler encodes the CTF kind in the ctt_type field.
CTF_K_FORWARD is used as the CTF type as usual in the ctt_info. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x26000000\[\t
\]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-func-index-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-func-index-1.c
index 86ca795c9ab1..aff41e3f063f 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-func-index-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-func-index-1.c
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
In this testcase, 2 records in the function index section are expected. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "funcinfo_name" 2 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-1.c
index cc1a600adbd3..fc53fd90e512 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-1.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
/* CTF generation of function pointers. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x16000001\[\t
\]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x16000002\[\t
\]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-2.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-2.c
index a4a1104ae8c6..80b9c188ceed 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-2.c
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
In this testcase, there is a single function type expected for two
different function pointer types. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x16000001\[\t
\]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"rcu_callback_t.0\"\[\t
\]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-3.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-3.c
index fe35d6c7f2e2..f9b0aefc9801 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-3.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
In this testcase, there is a single function type expected. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x16000001\[\t
\]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"foo_init_callback.0\"\[\t
\]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-4.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-4.c
index b8a741766ed3..02a715132b68 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-4.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-4.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
In this testcase, Type de-duplication of function type is exercised. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x16000001\[\t
\]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"var_assign_func_t.0\"\[\t
\]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-functions-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-functions-1.c
index 0b086a5af3df..b94dca57b966 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-functions-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-functions-1.c
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
*/
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x16000002\[\t
\]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-int-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-int-1.c
index 8c68b2e7edea..e4ffcc2b3eb1 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-int-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-int-1.c
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
/* Tests for CTF integer base types.
- Verify that there is a single record for the base types. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"int.0\"\[\t
\]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"short int.0\"\[\t
\]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-objt-index-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-objt-index-1.c
index ee3481af7235..f66c3de83723 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-objt-index-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-objt-index-1.c
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
In this testcase, 4 records in the object index section are expected. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "objtinfo_name" 4 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-pointers-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-pointers-1.c
index e1fccec2d032..bb1067faad07 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-pointers-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-pointers-1.c
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
- struct foo_struct *
*/
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"foo_struct.0\"\[\t
\]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-pointers-2.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-pointers-2.c
index e36e5ec741bc..e6e1202bb88e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-pointers-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-pointers-2.c
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
In this testcase, one CTF pointer type record is expected. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0xe000000\[\t
\]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-preamble-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-preamble-1.c
index 28547fae9a97..2df0c28c314b 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-preamble-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-preamble-1.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
/* Verify the CTF preamble in the CTF section. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "0xdff2.*CTF preamble magic number" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "0x4.*CTF preamble version" } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-str-table-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-str-table-1.c
index 0a0f1f033f72..fc40ddeec99b 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-str-table-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-str-table-1.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
single empty string. Just an optimization by the compiler, it is not
mandated by the CTF format. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \".0\"\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string"
1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-1.c
index 19711c04bf7e..4ad8ff5ddca7 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-1.c
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
struct b : ctt_into = 0x1a000002 (2 field members)
*/
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x1a000004\[\t
\]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-2.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-2.c
index 09b4d2f8f789..3a65013a3f49 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-2.c
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Further, the compiler is expected to generate a single CTF struct type for
struct dmx_dtdef (due to Type de-duplication at CTF generation). */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"dmx_dtdef.0\"\[\t
\]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"dtd_name.0\"\[\t
\]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-array-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-array-1.c
index d6c6b6be91fd..3bd302ad1813 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-array-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-array-1.c
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
Deemed as acceptable for now. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"cmodel.0\"\[\t
\]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-array-2.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-array-2.c
index 37094b5d4202..17c0d9491df0 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-array-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-array-2.c
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
the location. CTF generation feeds off DWARF dies; this testcase tests
that the location expr is handled. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA -gdwarf-2" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x12000000\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 }
} */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-1.c
index aa40ab0a6715..8d5916c1b6c2 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-1.c
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
unique (type of a, b, c will all point to int); hence, the check.
*/
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x2a000000\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 7 }
} */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-2.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-2.c
index 8c9d3bb19ce2..fe8724e16a1a 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-2.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
In this testcase, typedef of type void should be generated. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x2a000000\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 }
} */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-3.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-3.c
index 93d0845b0427..c211e59334cb 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-3.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
In this testcase, a single CTF record for typedef is expected. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x2a000000\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 }
} */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-1.c
index 19e8f496105c..38003783facf 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-1.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
typedef struct my_int
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-2.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-2.c
index deeb85aab9da..d49812d789c9 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-2.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
/* Test compilation of typedef composition in structs. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
typedef struct
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-3.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-3.c
index 6d6918b15368..f13822d3ec35 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-3.c
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
4: const my_int_t (size 0x8) -> 3: my_int_t (size 0x8) -> 1: struct
my_int (size 0x8)
*/
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x4\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctv_typeidx" 1
} } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-union-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-union-1.c
index 929d53298394..87213180b5e0 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-union-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-union-1.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
/* CTF generation for union type. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x1e000004\[\t
\]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ctm_name" 4 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-1.c
index 8c3ab1050e0c..1f8de9215c6e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-1.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
In this testcase, 7 records in the variable info section are expected. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ctv_name" 7 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-2.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-2.c
index 75c3ed790f4e..316f76c5a0c1 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-2.c
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
In this testcase, CTF record for bstatic is NOT expected. CTF generation
is only carried out for variables at file-scope or global-scope. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ctv_name" 0 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-3.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-3.c
index 8aea1e82749e..5697db6be5b3 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-3.c
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
single CTF variable and a single entry in the CTF object info section
are expected. */
-/* { dg-do compile ) */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x12000000\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 2 }
} */
--
2.46.0
