On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 12:53:25PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 9/16/24 7:08 PM, Marek Polacek wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 10:37:31AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: > > > On 8/29/24 12:23 PM, Marek Polacek wrote: > > > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk/14? > > > > > > > > -- >8 -- > > > > Pre r14-4793, we'd call warn_tautological_cmp -> operand_equal_p > > > > with operands wrapped in NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR, which works, since > > > > o_e_p bails for codes it doesn't know. But now we pass operands > > > > not encapsulated in NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR, and crash, because the > > > > template tree for &a[x] has null DECL_FIELD_OFFSET. > > > > > > Why are we trying to compare DECL_FIELD_OFFSET in C++, anyway? I'd think > > > we > > > should limit that to C and in C++ rely on FIELD_DECL identity. > > > > This goes back to r12-7797. I suppose it's trying to handle C++ because we > > can't use c_dialect_cxx () in fold-const. I know there's lang_GNU_CXX but > > I suggest we do the following. > > > > I don't think I meant this warning to be called in a template, > > > > so let's avoid the problem this easy way. > > > > > > Hmm, it seems potentially useful in a template, especially since we > > > suppress > > > it in instantiations. > > > > Ack. > > > > How about this? > > > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk? > > > > -- >8 -- > > Pre r14-4793, we'd call warn_tautological_cmp -> operand_equal_p > > with operands wrapped in NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR, which works, since > > o_e_p bails for codes it doesn't know. But now we pass operands > > not encapsulated in NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR, and crash, because the > > template tree for &a[x] has null DECL_FIELD_OFFSET. > > > > This patch extends r12-7797 to cover the case when DECL_FIELD_OFFSET > > is null. > > > > PR c++/116534 > > > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > > > * fold-const.cc (operand_compare::operand_equal_p): Check > > DECL_FIELD_OFFSET. > > > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > > > * g++.dg/warn/Wtautological-compare4.C: New test. > > --- > > gcc/fold-const.cc | 16 ++++++++------ > > .../g++.dg/warn/Wtautological-compare4.C | 21 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wtautological-compare4.C > > > > diff --git a/gcc/fold-const.cc b/gcc/fold-const.cc > > index 70db16759d0..3da09621584 100644 > > --- a/gcc/fold-const.cc > > +++ b/gcc/fold-const.cc > > @@ -3601,12 +3601,16 @@ operand_compare::operand_equal_p (const_tree arg0, > > const_tree arg1, > > /* Non-FIELD_DECL operands can appear in C++ templates. */ > > if (TREE_CODE (field0) != FIELD_DECL > > - || TREE_CODE (field1) != FIELD_DECL > > - || !operand_equal_p (DECL_FIELD_OFFSET (field0), > > - DECL_FIELD_OFFSET (field1), flags) > > - || !operand_equal_p (DECL_FIELD_BIT_OFFSET (field0), > > - DECL_FIELD_BIT_OFFSET (field1), > > - flags)) > > + || TREE_CODE (field1) != FIELD_DECL) > > + return false; > > + > > + if (DECL_FIELD_OFFSET (field0) > > + && DECL_FIELD_OFFSET (field1) > > + && (!operand_equal_p (DECL_FIELD_OFFSET (field0), > > + DECL_FIELD_OFFSET (field1), flags) > > + || !operand_equal_p (DECL_FIELD_BIT_OFFSET (field0), > > + DECL_FIELD_BIT_OFFSET (field1), > > + flags))) > > If at least one has null FIELD_OFFSET, I'd think we still want to compare > them for being ==, this seems to assume that a field with null offset is > equal to any other field.
Oop, you're right, that's no good. Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk/14? -- >8 -- Pre r14-4793, we'd call warn_tautological_cmp -> operand_equal_p with operands wrapped in NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR, which works, since o_e_p bails for codes it doesn't know. But now we pass operands not encapsulated in NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR, and crash, because the template tree for &a[x] has null DECL_FIELD_OFFSET. This patch extends r12-7797 to cover the case when DECL_FIELD_OFFSET is null. PR c++/116534 gcc/ChangeLog: * fold-const.cc (operand_compare::operand_equal_p): If either field's DECL_FIELD_OFFSET is null, compare the fields with ==. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/warn/Wtautological-compare4.C: New test. --- gcc/fold-const.cc | 12 ++++++++--- .../g++.dg/warn/Wtautological-compare4.C | 21 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wtautological-compare4.C diff --git a/gcc/fold-const.cc b/gcc/fold-const.cc index 70db16759d0..0578f42ac0c 100644 --- a/gcc/fold-const.cc +++ b/gcc/fold-const.cc @@ -3601,9 +3601,15 @@ operand_compare::operand_equal_p (const_tree arg0, const_tree arg1, /* Non-FIELD_DECL operands can appear in C++ templates. */ if (TREE_CODE (field0) != FIELD_DECL - || TREE_CODE (field1) != FIELD_DECL - || !operand_equal_p (DECL_FIELD_OFFSET (field0), - DECL_FIELD_OFFSET (field1), flags) + || TREE_CODE (field1) != FIELD_DECL) + return false; + + if (!DECL_FIELD_OFFSET (field0) + || !DECL_FIELD_OFFSET (field1)) + return field0 == field1; + + if (!operand_equal_p (DECL_FIELD_OFFSET (field0), + DECL_FIELD_OFFSET (field1), flags) || !operand_equal_p (DECL_FIELD_BIT_OFFSET (field0), DECL_FIELD_BIT_OFFSET (field1), flags)) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wtautological-compare4.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wtautological-compare4.C new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..96308f49a42 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wtautological-compare4.C @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +// PR c++/116534 +// { dg-do compile } +// { dg-options "-Wall" } + +template <class A> +struct Test { + bool foo(unsigned x, unsigned y) { + bool test = &a[x] == &b[y]; + return test; + } + unsigned *a; + unsigned *b; +}; + +void +g () +{ + Test<int> t; + t.foo (0u, 1u); + t.foo (0u, 0u); +} base-commit: dfe0d4389a3ce43179563a63046ad3e74d615a08 -- 2.46.0