On 9/17/24 3:26 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk/14/13?

OK.

-- >8 --
r12-3495 added maybe_warn_about_constant_value which will crash if
it gets a nameless VAR_DECL, which is what happens in this PR.

We created this VAR_DECL in cp_parser_decomposition_declaration.

        PR c++/116676

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        * constexpr.cc (maybe_warn_about_constant_value): Check DECL_NAME.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-116676.C: New test.
---
  gcc/cp/constexpr.cc                           |  1 +
  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-116676.C | 57 +++++++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 58 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-116676.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
index d0f61748141..c3668b0d7d3 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
@@ -7222,6 +7222,7 @@ maybe_warn_about_constant_value (location_t loc, tree 
decl)
        && warn_interference_size
        && !OPTION_SET_P (param_destruct_interfere_size)
        && DECL_CONTEXT (decl) == std_node
+      && DECL_NAME (decl)
        && id_equal (DECL_NAME (decl), "hardware_destructive_interference_size")
        && (LOCATION_FILE (input_location) != main_input_filename
          || module_exporting_p ())
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-116676.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-116676.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..1cb65f10a1d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-116676.C
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+// PR c++/116676
+// { dg-do compile { target c++17 } }
+
+namespace std {
+typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t;
+
+  template<typename _Tp>
+    struct remove_reference
+    { typedef _Tp type; };
+
+  template<typename _Tp>
+    struct remove_reference<_Tp&>
+    { typedef _Tp type; };
+
+  template<typename _Tp>
+    struct remove_reference<_Tp&&>
+    { typedef _Tp type; };
+
+template <typename _Tp>
+constexpr typename std::remove_reference<_Tp>::type &&
+move(_Tp &&__t) noexcept {
+  return static_cast<typename std::remove_reference<_Tp>::type &&>(__t);
+}
+template <typename _Tp> struct tuple_size;
+template <size_t __i, typename _Tp> struct tuple_element;
+template <typename _U1, typename _U2> class __pair_base {};
+template <typename _T1, typename _T2>
+struct pair {
+  _T1 first;
+  _T2 second;
+  template <typename _U1 = _T1, typename _U2 = _T2>
+  explicit constexpr pair(const _T1 &__a, const _T2 &__b)
+      : first(__a), second(__b) {}
+};
+template <class _Tp1, class _Tp2>
+struct tuple_size<pair<_Tp1, _Tp2>>
+{
+static constexpr size_t value = 2;
+};
+template <class _Tp1, class _Tp2>
+struct tuple_element<0, pair<_Tp1, _Tp2>> {
+  typedef _Tp1 type;
+};
+template <class _Tp1, class _Tp2>
+struct tuple_element<1, pair<_Tp1, _Tp2>> {
+  typedef _Tp2 type;
+};
+
+template <size_t _Int, class _Tp1, class _Tp2>
+constexpr typename tuple_element<_Int, pair<_Tp1, _Tp2>>::type &
+get(pair<_Tp1, _Tp2> &&__in) noexcept {
+  return (std::move(__in).first);
+}
+int t;
+auto [a, b] = std::pair<int&, int>{t, 1};
+}
+

base-commit: a92f54f580c37732a5de01e47aed56882231f196

Reply via email to