It was pointed out in
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-September/662183.html,
that the wording with this print has too many words.
Fixed thusly.
Pushed as obvious after a build and test for x86_64-linux-gnu.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* gimple-ssa-split-paths.cc (is_feasible_trace): Fix wording
on the print.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski <quic_apin...@quicinc.com>
---
gcc/gimple-ssa-split-paths.cc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/gimple-ssa-split-paths.cc b/gcc/gimple-ssa-split-paths.cc
index 32b5c445760..886d85a94e4 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-ssa-split-paths.cc
+++ b/gcc/gimple-ssa-split-paths.cc
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ is_feasible_trace (basic_block bb)
{
if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
fprintf (dump_file,
- "Duplicating block %d would be too duplicate "
+ "Duplicating block %d would duplicate "
"too many statments: %d >= %d\n",
bb->index, num_stmts_in_join,
param_max_jump_thread_duplication_stmts);
--
2.43.0
