On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 2:44 PM Andrew Pinski <pins...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 2:36 PM Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 02:05:21PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > > The code in aarch64_lookup_shared_state_flags all C++11 attributes on the 
> > > function type
> > > had a namespace associated with them. But with the addition of 
> > > reproducible/unsequenced,
> > > this was no longer true.
> > > This is the simple fix to ignore attributes in the global namespace since 
> > > we are looking
> > > for ones in the `arm` namespace instead.
> > >
> > > Built and tested for aarch64-linux-gnu.
> > >
> > > gcc/ChangeLog:
> > >
> > >       * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_lookup_shared_state_flags): 
> > > Ignore
> > >       attributes in the global namespace.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski <quic_apin...@quicinc.com>
> > > ---
> > >  gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 4 ++++
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> > > index 27e24ba70ab..3f7bc572edc 100644
> > > --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> > > +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> > > @@ -597,6 +597,10 @@ aarch64_lookup_shared_state_flags (tree attrs, const 
> > > char *state_name)
> > >        if (!cxx11_attribute_p (attr))
> > >       continue;
> > >
> > > +      /* Skip the attributes in the global namespace. */
> > > +      if (!TREE_PURPOSE (TREE_PURPOSE (attr)))
> > > +     continue;
> > > +
> > >        auto ns = IDENTIFIER_POINTER (TREE_PURPOSE (TREE_PURPOSE (attr)));
> > >        if (strcmp (ns, "arm") != 0)
> > >       continue;
> >
> > Take it or leave it, but I think the whole thing could be just
> >
> >   tree ns = get_attribute_namespace (attr);
> >   if (!ns || !id_equal (ns, "arm"))
> >     continue;
>
> Actually I think it could be reduced further down to just:
> if (!is_attribute_namespace_p ("arm", attr))
>   continue;
>
> In this case.
>
> If I get some time this weekend I will submit a patch to clean up this code.

In the end I did it today.
New patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-September/662325.html

Thanks again for the suggestion and the review.

Thanks,
Andrew

>
> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski
>
> >
> > You could also use get_attribute_name below for attr_name.
> >
> > Marek
> >

Reply via email to