On 9/3/24 2:47 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk/14?
OK.
-- >8 -- We ICE in nothrow_spec_p because it got a DEFERRED_NOEXCEPT. This DEFERRED_NOEXCEPT was created in implicitly_declare_fn when declaring Foo& operator=(Foo&&) = default; in the test. The problem is that in resolve_overloaded_unification we call maybe_instantiate_noexcept before try_one_overload only in the TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR case. PR c++/113108 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * pt.cc (resolve_overloaded_unification): Call maybe_instantiate_noexcept. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type28.C: New test. --- gcc/cp/pt.cc | 2 ++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type28.C | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type28.C diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc index 024fa8a5529..747e627f547 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc @@ -23787,6 +23787,8 @@ resolve_overloaded_unification (tree tparms, for (lkp_iterator iter (arg); iter; ++iter) { tree fn = *iter; + if (flag_noexcept_type) + maybe_instantiate_noexcept (fn, tf_none); if (try_one_overload (tparms, targs, tempargs, parm, TREE_TYPE (fn), strict, sub_strict, addr_p, explain_p) && (!goodfn || !decls_match (goodfn, fn))) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type28.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type28.C new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..bf0b927b8ec --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type28.C @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +// PR c++/113108 +// { dg-do compile { target c++17 } } + +template <typename T> +struct Foo { + Foo& operator=(Foo&&) = default; + T data; +}; + +template <typename T> +void consume(Foo<T>& (Foo<T>::*)(Foo<T>&&) ) {} + +template <typename T> +void consume(Foo<T>& (Foo<T>::*)(Foo<T>&&) noexcept) {} + +int main() { + consume(&Foo<int>::operator=); +} base-commit: f0ab3de6ec0e3540f2e57f3f5628005f0a4e3fa5