On Jun 28, 2012, at 5:15 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 04:43:05PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote: >> On Jun 28, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >>> Perhaps you want to pursue this? We'd need to suggest this to dejagnu, >> >> Actually, we have the technology, so that isn't necessary. :-) You can >> install replacements for any procs you want, not pretty, but... it does >> work. I think this is a more deterministic path forward than waiting for a >> mythical dejagnu release. Also, we then can avoid the hassle of requiring a >> new dejagnu. > > Wouldn't that mean that we have to completely replace proc load_lib?
Yes; worse, it is a cut-n-paste from dejagnu and can effectively rev lock us to the current dejagnu release... One can delegate, but I don't think any pre or post processing in this case is enough to `fix' the issue, so it would be a wholesale replacement. > But anyway. > Mike, it would be nice if you could fix >> +# BUG: gcc-dg calls gcc-set-multilib-library-path but does not load >> gcc-defs! Sounds like a single line fix. It is the testing of that fix that is the annoying part.
