On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 7:36 AM Jiang, Haochen <haochen.ji...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Hongtao Liu <crazy...@gmail.com> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2024 1:47 PM > > To: Jiang, Haochen <haochen.ji...@intel.com> > > Cc: haochen.jiang <haoch...@smtp.intel.com>; ad...@levyhsu.com; gcc- > > regress...@gcc.gnu.org; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > > Subject: Re: [r15-3359 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx10_2-bf-vector- > > cmpp-1.c (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64 > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 9:45 AM Jiang, Haochen via Gcc-regression > > <gcc-regress...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > > > > > As each AVX10.2 testcases previously, this is caused by option combination > > warning, > > > which is expected. > > > > > Can we put the warning for mix usage of mavx10 and -mavx512f under - > > Wpsabi > > And add -Wno-psabi in addition to -march=cascadelake to avoid the > > false positive? > > We could do that if nobody has objection to that.
But mixing both doesn't do anything to the ABI so -Wpsabi sounds like the wrong bucket to me. Instead we have to solve the issue at hand - I would expect users to run into this warning as well if we do within our testsuite? Richard. > Thx, > Haochen > > > > > -- > > BR, > > Hongtao
