Hi Patrick, Could you please help to re-trigger the pre-commit? Thanks in advance!
Pan -----Original Message----- From: Patrick O'Neill <patr...@rivosinc.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2024 12:14 AM To: Li, Pan2 <pan2...@intel.com>; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; kito.ch...@gmail.com; rdapp....@gmail.com; Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] RISC-V: Add testcases for unsigned scalar quad and oct .SAT_TRUNC form 2 Hi Pan, Once the postcommit baseline moves forward (trunk is currently failing to build linux targets [1] [2]) I'll re-trigger precommit for you. Thanks, Patrick [1]: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116409 [2]: https://github.com/patrick-rivos/gcc-postcommit-ci/issues/1564 On 8/18/24 19:49, Li, Pan2 wrote: > Turn out that the pre-commit doesn't pick up the newest upstream when testing > this patch. > > Pan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Li, Pan2 <pan2...@intel.com> > Sent: Monday, August 19, 2024 9:25 AM > To: Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com>; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Cc: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; kito.ch...@gmail.com; rdapp....@gmail.com > Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 1/2] RISC-V: Add testcases for unsigned scalar quad > and oct .SAT_TRUNC form 2 > > Opps, let me double check what happened to my local tester. > > Pan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com> > Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2024 11:21 PM > To: Li, Pan2 <pan2...@intel.com>; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Cc: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; kito.ch...@gmail.com; rdapp....@gmail.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] RISC-V: Add testcases for unsigned scalar quad > and oct .SAT_TRUNC form 2 > > > > On 8/18/24 12:10 AM, pan2...@intel.com wrote: >> From: Pan Li <pan2...@intel.com> >> >> This patch would like to add test cases for the unsigned scalar quad and >> oct .SAT_TRUNC form 2. Aka: >> >> Form 2: >> #define DEF_SAT_U_TRUC_FMT_2(NT, WT) \ >> NT __attribute__((noinline)) \ >> sat_u_truc_##WT##_to_##NT##_fmt_2 (WT x) \ >> { \ >> WT max = (WT)(NT)-1; \ >> return x > max ? (NT) max : (NT)x; \ >> } >> >> QUAD: >> DEF_SAT_U_TRUC_FMT_2 (uint16_t, uint64_t) >> DEF_SAT_U_TRUC_FMT_2 (uint8_t, uint32_t) >> >> OCT: >> DEF_SAT_U_TRUC_FMT_2 (uint8_t, uint64_t) >> >> The below test is passed for this patch. >> * The rv64gcv regression test. >> >> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: >> >> * gcc.target/riscv/sat_u_trunc-10.c: New test. >> * gcc.target/riscv/sat_u_trunc-11.c: New test. >> * gcc.target/riscv/sat_u_trunc-12.c: New test. >> * gcc.target/riscv/sat_u_trunc-run-10.c: New test. >> * gcc.target/riscv/sat_u_trunc-run-11.c: New test. >> * gcc.target/riscv/sat_u_trunc-run-12.c: New test. > Looks like they're failing in the upstream pre-commit tester: > >> https://github.com/ewlu/gcc-precommit-ci/issues/2066#issuecomment-2295137578 > > jeff
