This new test was reported to be still failing on sparc targets.
Here the number of DW_AT_ranges dropped to zero.
The test should pass on this architecture with -Os, -O2 and -O3.
I tried to improve also different known problematic targets,
where only one subroutine had DW_AT_ranges:
Those are armhf (arm with hard float), powerpc and powerpc64.
The best option is to use -Os: So far the only one, where
all two inline instances in this test had two DW_AT_ranges.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        PR other/116462
        * gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline7.c: Switch to -Os optimization.
---
Hopefully this will be the final act, OK for trunk?

 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline7.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline7.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline7.c
index 083df5b586c..8b2fa1210ad 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline7.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline7.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 /* Verify that at least one of both inline instances have
    a DW_AT_ranges but no extra DW_TAG_lexical_block.  */
-/* { dg-options "-O -gdwarf -dA" } */
+/* { dg-options "-Os -gdwarf -dA" } */
 /* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\\(DIE \\(\[^\n\]*\\) 
DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine" 2 } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler " DW_AT_ranges" } } */
-- 
2.39.2

Reply via email to