On 8/20/24 11:52 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look
OK for trunk only?
OK.
-- >8 --
Extending the PR113063 testcase to additionally constant evaluate the <=>
expression causes us to trip over the assert in cxx_eval_call_expression
/* We used to shortcut trivial constructor/op= here, but nowadays
we can only get a trivial function here with -fno-elide-constructors. */
gcc_checking_assert (!trivial_fn_p (fun)
|| !flag_elide_constructors
/* We don't elide constructors when processing
a noexcept-expression. */
|| cp_noexcept_operand);
since the local class's <=> was first used and therefore synthesized in
a noexcept context and so its definition contains unelided trivial
constructors.
This patch fixes this by clearing cp_noexcept_operand alongside
cp_unevaluated_context in the local class case.
PR c++/113063
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* name-lookup.cc (local_state_t): Clear and restore
cp_noexcept_operand as well.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp2a/spaceship-synth16.C: Also constant evaluate the
<=> expression.
* g++.dg/cpp2a/spaceship-synth16a.C: Likewise.
---
gcc/cp/name-lookup.cc | 4 ++++
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/spaceship-synth16.C | 1 +
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/spaceship-synth16a.C | 1 +
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/cp/name-lookup.cc b/gcc/cp/name-lookup.cc
index 70ad4cbf3b5..6fb664b0082 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/name-lookup.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/name-lookup.cc
@@ -8775,6 +8775,7 @@ struct local_state_t
{
int cp_unevaluated_operand;
int c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings;
+ int saved_cp_noexcept_operand;
static local_state_t
save_and_clear ()
@@ -8784,6 +8785,8 @@ struct local_state_t
::cp_unevaluated_operand = 0;
s.c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings = ::c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings;
::c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings = 0;
+ s.saved_cp_noexcept_operand = cp_noexcept_operand;
+ cp_noexcept_operand = 0;
return s;
}
@@ -8792,6 +8795,7 @@ struct local_state_t
{
::cp_unevaluated_operand = this->cp_unevaluated_operand;
::c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings = this->c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings;
+ cp_noexcept_operand = this->saved_cp_noexcept_operand;
}
};
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/spaceship-synth16.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/spaceship-synth16.C
index 37a183de0f5..7dbe7e1db75 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/spaceship-synth16.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/spaceship-synth16.C
@@ -10,4 +10,5 @@ int main() {
X x;
static_assert(noexcept(x <=> x));
x <=> x;
+ constexpr auto r = x <=> x;
}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/spaceship-synth16a.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/spaceship-synth16a.C
index 68388a680b2..bc0e7a54b7e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/spaceship-synth16a.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/spaceship-synth16a.C
@@ -13,4 +13,5 @@ int main() {
X x;
static_assert(noexcept(x <=> x));
x <=> x;
+ constexpr auto r = X{} <=> X{};
}