> Am 23.08.2024 um 16:49 schrieb Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com>:
>
>
>
>> On 8/23/24 6:02 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>>
>> Hi, this fails on machines that don't support scheduling:
>> cc1: warning: instruction scheduling not supported on this target machine
>> FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr116343.c -O0 (test for excess errors)
>> Excess errors:
>> cc1: warning: instruction scheduling not supported on this target machine
> Two paths make sense to me.
>
> First we could add a -w to the flags in the relevant testcases to suppress
> the warning.
>
> Second we could just eliminate the warning completely. The warning may have
> made sense in the run-up to gcc-2 when we added the instruction scheduler.
> But we're 30 years past that point.
>
> I'd support either approach.
I think there’s an effective target for insn scheduling
> jeff
