On 19 June 2012 17:08, Steven Bosscher <stevenb....@gmail.com> wrote: > > Many functions have no leading comment, and other GNU coding standard > requirements are not followed either. Those should IMHO be fixed also, > before this front end can be accepted. >
To separate this from the other listed items. I am aware of certain things that are in definite need to spot check over. (NB: The coding convention was originally K&R, then changed over to Allman about 2 years ago, and recently changed over to GNU-like via several vim macros I wrote to carry out the quick re-format job). As well as the GCC coding convention, I would like to also know what of the C++ Coding convention is an absolutely *must* be followed to the letter on the wiki? As it states at the top that it is only a proposed set of coding conventions to be used when writing GCC in C++, and I am well aware that in GDC I do not follow some items, such as "All data members should have names which end with an underscore". http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CppConventions Regards -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
