On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 06:57:40PM +0100, Sam James wrote:
> > /* No instruction can have more operands than this. Sorry for this
> > arbitrary limit, but what machine will have an instruction with
> > @@ -112,6 +113,8 @@ static int next_operand_number = 1;
> > struct operand_data
> > {
> > struct operand_data *next;
> > + /* Point to the next member with the same hash value in the hash table.
> > */
> > + struct operand_data *eq_next;
> > int index;
> > const char *predicate;
> > const char *constraint;
> > @@ -127,7 +130,7 @@ struct operand_data
> >
> > static struct operand_data null_operand =
> > {
> > - 0, 0, "", "", E_VOIDmode, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
> > + 0, 0, 0, "", "", E_VOIDmode, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
> > };
> >
> > static struct operand_data *odata = &null_operand;
> > @@ -532,6 +535,13 @@ compare_operands (struct operand_data *d0, struct
> > operand_data *d1)
> > {
>
> Did the const change Richard suggested not work?
>
> (Also, note that he said it's fine to commit once his suggested changes
> are made.)
>
Thank you for the reminder. I will send the patch v5.
BR,
Xianmiao
