> From: Sam James <s...@gentoo.org>
> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 18:17:29 +0100

> Hans-Peter Nilsson <h...@axis.com> writes:
> 
> > I stumbled on this being a regression for cris-elf as well;
> > the patch expectedly fixes the test-case for CRIS as well.
> > It's been a week since the patch was posted and as I see no
> > replies, I'm pinging this in behalf of Dimitar.
> 
> I can't formally approve it but I think we should commit it. it's
> obviously right, the test author suggested it, and it wasn't being run
> until recently (i.e. we fully understand why this is only appearing
> now).

Oh!  I see it was part of that dg- fixup!  Yes, agreed:
given the history I'll commit it as obvious later today.
I don't mind if someone beats me to the punch.  Thanks.

brgds, H-P

> 
> thanks.
> 
> >
> >> From: Dimitar Dimitrov <dimi...@dinux.eu>
> >> Date: Mon,  5 Aug 2024 21:29:35 +0300
> >
> >> The size of "struct only_fam_2" is dependent on the alignment of the
> >> flexible array member "b", and not on the type of the preceding
> >> bit-fields.  For most targets the two are equal.  But on default_packed
> >> targets like pru-unknown-elf, the alignment of int is not equal to the
> >> size of int, so the test failed.
> >> 
> >> Patch was suggested by Qing Zhao.  Tested on pru-unknown-elf and
> >> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
> >> 
> >> Ok for master?
> >> 
> >>    PR testsuite/116155
> >> 
> >> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >> 
> >>    * c-c++-common/fam-in-union-alone-in-struct-1.c: Adjust
> >>    check to account for default_packed targets.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Dimitar Dimitrov <dimi...@dinux.eu>
> >> ---
> >>  gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/fam-in-union-alone-in-struct-1.c | 2 +-
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/fam-in-union-alone-in-struct-1.c 
> >> b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/fam-in-union-alone-in-struct-1.c
> >> index 39ebf17850b..9979e96fe70 100644
> >> --- a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/fam-in-union-alone-in-struct-1.c
> >> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/fam-in-union-alone-in-struct-1.c
> >> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ int main ()
> >>      __builtin_abort ();
> >>    if (sizeof (struct only_fam) != 0)
> >>      __builtin_abort ();
> >> -  if (sizeof (struct only_fam_2) != sizeof (int))
> >> +  if (sizeof (struct only_fam_2) != __alignof__ (int))
> >>      __builtin_abort ();
> >>    return 0;
> >>  }
> >> -- 
> >> 2.45.2
> >> 
> 

Reply via email to