Matthieu Longo <matthieu.lo...@arm.com> writes:
> On AArch64, the RA state informs the unwinder whether the return address
> is mangled and how, or not. This information is encoded in a boolean in
> the CFI row. This binary approach prevents from expressing more complex
> configuration, as it is the case with PAuth_LR introduced in Armv9.5-A.
>
> This patch addresses this limitation by replacing the boolean by an enum.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
>         * dwarf2cfi.cc
>         (struct dw_cfi_row): Declare a new enum type to replace ra_mangled.
>         (cfi_row_equal_p): Use ra_state instead of ra_mangled.
>         (dwarf2out_frame_debug_cfa_negate_ra_state): Same.
>         (change_cfi_row): Same.

OK with the changes that Jakub pointed out.

Thanks,
Richard

> ---
>  gcc/dwarf2cfi.cc | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2cfi.cc b/gcc/dwarf2cfi.cc
> index 6c80e0b17bd..023f61fb712 100644
> --- a/gcc/dwarf2cfi.cc
> +++ b/gcc/dwarf2cfi.cc
> @@ -57,6 +57,15 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
>  #define DEFAULT_INCOMING_FRAME_SP_OFFSET INCOMING_FRAME_SP_OFFSET
>  #endif
>  
> +
> +/* Signing method used for return address authentication.
> +   (AArch64 extension)*/
> +typedef enum
> +{
> +  RA_no_signing = 0x0,
> +  RA_signing_SP = 0x1,
> +} RA_signing_method_t;
> +
>  /* A collected description of an entire row of the abstract CFI table.  */
>  struct GTY(()) dw_cfi_row
>  {
> @@ -74,8 +83,8 @@ struct GTY(()) dw_cfi_row
>    bool window_save;
>  
>    /* Aarch64 extension for DW_CFA_AARCH64_negate_ra_state.
> -     True if the return address is in a mangled state.  */
> -  bool ra_mangled;
> +     Enum which stores the return address state.  */
> +  RA_signing_method_t ra_state;
>  };
>  
>  /* The caller's ORIG_REG is saved in SAVED_IN_REG.  */
> @@ -859,7 +868,7 @@ cfi_row_equal_p (dw_cfi_row *a, dw_cfi_row *b)
>    if (a->window_save != b->window_save)
>      return false;
>  
> -  if (a->ra_mangled != b->ra_mangled)
> +  if (a->ra_state != b->ra_state)
>      return false;
>  
>    return true;
> @@ -1556,8 +1565,11 @@ dwarf2out_frame_debug_cfa_negate_ra_state (void)
>  {
>    dw_cfi_ref cfi = new_cfi ();
>    cfi->dw_cfi_opc = DW_CFA_AARCH64_negate_ra_state;
> +  cur_row->ra_state =
> +       (cur_row->ra_state == RA_no_signing)
> +       ? RA_signing_SP
> +       : RA_no_signing;
>    add_cfi (cfi);
> -  cur_row->ra_mangled = !cur_row->ra_mangled;
>  }
>  
>  /* Record call frame debugging information for an expression EXPR,
> @@ -2414,12 +2426,12 @@ change_cfi_row (dw_cfi_row *old_row, dw_cfi_row 
> *new_row)
>      {
>        dw_cfi_ref cfi = new_cfi ();
>  
> -      gcc_assert (!old_row->ra_mangled && !new_row->ra_mangled);
> +      gcc_assert (!old_row->ra_state && !new_row->ra_state);
>        cfi->dw_cfi_opc = DW_CFA_GNU_window_save;
>        add_cfi (cfi);
>      }
>  
> -  if (old_row->ra_mangled != new_row->ra_mangled)
> +  if (old_row->ra_state != new_row->ra_state)
>      {
>        dw_cfi_ref cfi = new_cfi ();

Reply via email to