On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 11:23:51AM GMT, Martin Uecker wrote: > > Not really. 'zero' is only true for [0] and for [*], but nor for > > [zero], right? > > > > All vla tests seem to pass if I remove that line. The only issue will > > be that > > > > void f(char (*a)[*], int (*x)[__lengthof__(*a)]); > > > > will result in 'int (*x)[0]' until you change the implementation of [*], > > but I think we can live with that small detail. > > > I plan to change the representation of [0], so it would be nice if the > [*] cases are correct as much as possible so that they not get forgotten > later.
Ahhh, thanks! Will do, then. > > Martin Cheers, Alex -- <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
