Hi all,
Doing some catchup here. I plan to commit the following shortly. This is
one of Steve's patches posted on bugzilla.
I have created a new test case.
Regression tested on linux x86-64.
git show:
commit 4d4549937b789afe4037c2f8f80dfc2285504a1e (HEAD -> master)
Author: Steve Kargl <kar...@comcast.net>
Date: Thu Aug 1 21:50:49 2024 -0700
Fortran: Fix ICE on invalid in gfc_format_decoder.
PR fortran/104626
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
* symbol.cc (gfc_add_save): Add checks for SAVE attribute
conflicts and duplicate SAVE attribute.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gfortran.dg/pr104626.f90: New test.
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/symbol.cc b/gcc/fortran/symbol.cc
index a8479b862e3..b5143d9f790 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/symbol.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/symbol.cc
@@ -1307,9 +1307,8 @@ gfc_add_save (symbol_attribute *attr, save_state
s, const char *name,
if (s == SAVE_EXPLICIT && gfc_pure (NULL))
{
- gfc_error
- ("SAVE attribute at %L cannot be specified in a PURE procedure",
- where);
+ gfc_error ("SAVE attribute at %L cannot be specified in a PURE "
+ "procedure", where);
return false;
}
@@ -1319,10 +1318,15 @@ gfc_add_save (symbol_attribute *attr, save_state
s, const char *name,
if (s == SAVE_EXPLICIT && attr->save == SAVE_EXPLICIT
&& (flag_automatic || pedantic))
{
- if (!gfc_notify_std (GFC_STD_LEGACY,
- "Duplicate SAVE attribute specified at %L",
- where))
+ if (!where)
+ {
+ gfc_error ("Duplicate SAVE attribute specified near %C");
return false;
+ }
+
+ if (!gfc_notify_std (GFC_STD_LEGACY, "Duplicate SAVE attribute "
+ "specified at %L", where))
+ return false;
}
attr->save = s;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr104626.f90
b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr104626.f90
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..faff65a8c92
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr104626.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+program p
+ procedure(g), save :: f ! { dg-error "PROCEDURE attribute conflicts" }
+ procedure(g), save :: f ! { dg-error "Duplicate SAVE attribute" }
+contains
+ subroutine g
+ end
+end