> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2024 8:46 PM
> To: Prathamesh Kulkarni <prathame...@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>; Richard Sandiford
> <richard.sandif...@arm.com>; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Support streaming of poly_int for offloading when it's
> degree <= accel's NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS
> 
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 02:58:34PM +0000, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > There are a couple of issues in the patch:
> > (1) The patch streams out NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS at beginning of
> > mode_table, which should work for bp_unpack_poly_value, (since AFAIK,
> > it's only called by lto_input_mode_table). However, I am not sure if
> we will always call lto_input_mode_table before streaming in poly_int64
> / poly_uint64 ? Or should we stream out host NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS at a
> different place in LTO bytecode ?
> 
> The poly_ints unpacked in lto_input_mode_table obviously are done after
> that.
> If you use it for streaming in from other sections, you need to check if
> they can't be read before the mode table.
> And, you don't really need to stream out/in the number for non-
> offloading LTO, that should use just NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS.
> 
> > --- a/gcc/data-streamer-in.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/data-streamer-in.cc
> > @@ -183,9 +183,7 @@ poly_uint64
> >  streamer_read_poly_uint64 (class lto_input_block *ib)  {
> >    poly_uint64 res;
> > -  for (unsigned int i = 0; i < NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS; ++i)
> > -    res.coeffs[i] = streamer_read_uhwi (ib);
> > -  return res;
> > +  POLY_INT_READ_COMMON(res, streamer_read_uhwi (ib))
> 
> Why is this macro and not an inline function or inline function template
> oor inline function calling a lambda?
> Even if it has to be a macro (I don't see why), it should be defined
> such that you need to add ; at the end, ideally not include the return
> res; in there because it is just too weird if used like that (or make it
> return what will be returned and use return POLY_INT_READ_COMMON...) and
> there needs to be a space in between COMMON and (.
> 
> > @@ -194,9 +192,7 @@ poly_int64
> >  streamer_read_poly_int64 (class lto_input_block *ib)  {
> >    poly_int64 res;
> > -  for (unsigned int i = 0; i < NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS; ++i)
> > -    res.coeffs[i] = streamer_read_hwi (ib);
> > -  return res;
> > +  POLY_INT_READ_COMMON(res, streamer_read_hwi (ib))
> >  }
> 
> Ditto.
> > +       __typeof(x.coeffs[0]) val = streamer_read_coeff;
> \
> 
> You certainly can't use a GCC extension like __typeof here.
> Plus missing space.
> 
> > +       if (val != 0)
> \
> > +         fatal_error (input_location,
> \
> > +                      "Degree of %<poly_int%> exceeds "
> \
> 
> Diagnostics shouldn't start with uppercase letter.
> 
> > +                      "%<NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS%> (%d)",
> \
> > +                      NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS);
> \
> > +     }
> \
> > +    }
> \
> > +
> \
> > +  return x;
> \
> > +}
> > +
> > --- a/gcc/poly-int.h
> > +++ b/gcc/poly-int.h
> > @@ -354,6 +354,10 @@ struct poly_result<T1, T2, 2>
> >     ? (void) ((RES).coeffs[I] = VALUE) \
> >     : (void) ((RES).coeffs[I].~C (), new (&(RES).coeffs[I]) C
> > (VALUE)))
> >
> > +/* Number of bits needed to represent maximum value of
> > +   NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS defined by any target.  */ #define
> > +MAX_NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS_BITS (2)
> 
> Why (2) and not just 2?
> There should be some static_assert to make sure it is a maximum for any
> target.
> 
> > +       if (!integer_zerop (val))
> > +         fatal_error (input_location,
> > +                      "Degree of %<poly_int%> exceeds "
> 
> Again.
Hi Jakub,
Thanks for the suggestions. The attached patch streams out NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS 
only if offloading is enabled,
defines poly_int_read_common to be variadic template, and asserts that 
host_num_poly_int_coeffs is streamed-in
before reading poly_int (AFAIU, the only user of streamer_read_poly_int64 
currently is ipa-modref pass).

Patch passes LTO bootstrap+test on aarch64-linux-gnu and in-progress on 
x86_64-linux-gnu. To test this patch with
offloading enabled, I have so far just been testing libgomp (make 
check-target-libgomp). Should I be testing any
additional parts of the testsuite for offloading ?

Does the attached patch look in the right direction ?

Signed-off-by: Prathamesh Kulkarni <prathame...@nvidia.com>

Thanks,
Prathamesh
> > +                      "%<NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS%>");
> > +     }
> > +    }
> >  }
> 
>         Jakub

Partially support streaming of poly_int for offloading.

The patch streams out host NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS, and changes
streaming in as follows:

if (host_num_poly_int_coeffs <= NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS)
{
  for (i = 0; i < host_num_poly_int_coeffs; i++)
    poly_int.coeffs[i] = stream_in coeff;
  for (; i < NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS; i++)
    poly_int.coeffs[i] = 0;
}
else
{
  for (i = 0; i < NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS; i++)
    poly_int.coeffs[i] = stream_in coeff;

  /* Ensure that degree of poly_int <= accel NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS.  */ 
  for (; i < host_num_poly_int_coeffs; i++)
    {
      val = stream_in coeff;
      if (val != 0)
        error ();
    }
}

gcc/ChangeLog:
        PR ipa/96265
        PR ipa/111937
        * data-streamer-in.cc (streamer_read_poly_uint64): Remove code for
        streaming, and call poly_int_read_common instead. 
        (streamer_read_poly_int64): Likewise.
        * data-streamer.cc (host_num_poly_int_coeffs): New variable.
        * data-streamer.h (host_num_poly_int_coeffs): Declare.
        (poly_int_read_common): New function template.
        (bp_unpack_poly_value): Remove code for streaming and call
        poly_int_read_common instead.
        * lto-streamer-in.cc (lto_input_mode_table): Stream-in host
        NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS into host_num_poly_int_coeffs.
        * lto-streamer-out.cc (lto_write_mode_table): Stream out
        NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS if offloading is enabled.
        * poly-int.h (MAX_NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS_BITS): New macro.
        * tree-streamer-in.cc (lto_input_ts_poly_tree_pointers): Adjust
        streaming-in of poly_int.

Signed-off-by: Prathamesh Kulkarni <prathame...@nvidia.com>

diff --git a/gcc/data-streamer-in.cc b/gcc/data-streamer-in.cc
index 7dce2928ef0..7b9d8cc0129 100644
--- a/gcc/data-streamer-in.cc
+++ b/gcc/data-streamer-in.cc
@@ -182,10 +182,8 @@ streamer_read_hwi (class lto_input_block *ib)
 poly_uint64
 streamer_read_poly_uint64 (class lto_input_block *ib)
 {
-  poly_uint64 res;
-  for (unsigned int i = 0; i < NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS; ++i)
-    res.coeffs[i] = streamer_read_uhwi (ib);
-  return res;
+  return poly_int_read_common<poly_int_traits<poly_uint64>::coeff_type>
+        (streamer_read_uhwi, ib);
 }
 
 /* Read a poly_int64 from IB.  */
@@ -193,10 +191,8 @@ streamer_read_poly_uint64 (class lto_input_block *ib)
 poly_int64
 streamer_read_poly_int64 (class lto_input_block *ib)
 {
-  poly_int64 res;
-  for (unsigned int i = 0; i < NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS; ++i)
-    res.coeffs[i] = streamer_read_hwi (ib);
-  return res;
+  return poly_int_read_common<poly_int_traits<poly_int64>::coeff_type>
+        (streamer_read_hwi, ib);
 }
 
 /* Read gcov_type value from IB.  */
diff --git a/gcc/data-streamer.cc b/gcc/data-streamer.cc
index 346b294c72a..5bf2f086d2a 100644
--- a/gcc/data-streamer.cc
+++ b/gcc/data-streamer.cc
@@ -28,6 +28,12 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
 #include "cgraph.h"
 #include "data-streamer.h"
 
+/* For offloading -- While streaming-out, host NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS is
+   stored at beginning of mode_table. While streaming-in, the value is read in
+   host_num_poly_int_coeffs.  */
+
+unsigned host_num_poly_int_coeffs = 0;
+
 /* Pack WORK into BP in a variant of uleb format.  */
 
 void
diff --git a/gcc/data-streamer.h b/gcc/data-streamer.h
index 6a2596134ce..c77eacb74ca 100644
--- a/gcc/data-streamer.h
+++ b/gcc/data-streamer.h
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ void bp_pack_real_value (struct bitpack_d *, const 
REAL_VALUE_TYPE *);
 void bp_unpack_real_value (struct bitpack_d *, REAL_VALUE_TYPE *);
 unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT bp_unpack_var_len_unsigned (struct bitpack_d *);
 HOST_WIDE_INT bp_unpack_var_len_int (struct bitpack_d *);
+extern unsigned host_num_poly_int_coeffs;
 
 /* In data-streamer-out.cc  */
 void streamer_write_zero (struct output_block *);
@@ -194,15 +195,53 @@ bp_unpack_value (struct bitpack_d *bp, unsigned nbits)
   return val & mask;
 }
 
+/* Common code for reading poly_int.  */
+
+template<typename C, typename F, typename ...Args>
+poly_int<NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS, C>
+poly_int_read_common (F read_coeff, Args ...args)
+{
+  poly_int<NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS, C> x;
+  unsigned i;
+
+#ifndef ACCEL_COMPILER
+  host_num_poly_int_coeffs = NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS;
+#endif
+
+  /* Ensure that we have streamed-in host_num_poly_int_coeffs.  */
+  gcc_assert (host_num_poly_int_coeffs > 0);
+  if (host_num_poly_int_coeffs <= NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS)
+    {
+      for (i = 0; i < host_num_poly_int_coeffs; i++)
+       x.coeffs[i] = read_coeff (args...);
+      for (; i < NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS; i++)
+       x.coeffs[i] = 0;
+    }
+  else
+    {
+      for (i = 0; i < NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS; i++)
+       x.coeffs[i] = read_coeff (args...);
+
+      /* Ensure that degree of poly_int <= accel NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS.  */
+      for (; i < host_num_poly_int_coeffs; i++)
+       {
+         C val = read_coeff (args...);
+         if (val != 0)
+           fatal_error (input_location,
+                        "degree of %<poly_int%> exceeds "
+                        "%<NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS%> (%d)",
+                        NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS);
+       }
+    }
+  return x;
+}
+
 /* Unpacks a polynomial value from the bit-packing context BP in which each
    coefficient has NBITS bits.  */
 inline poly_int<NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS, bitpack_word_t>
 bp_unpack_poly_value (struct bitpack_d *bp, unsigned nbits)
 {
-  poly_int<NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS, bitpack_word_t> x;
-  for (int i = 0; i < NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS; ++i)
-    x.coeffs[i] = bp_unpack_value (bp, nbits);
-  return x;
+  return poly_int_read_common<bitpack_word_t> (bp_unpack_value, bp, nbits);
 }
 
 
diff --git a/gcc/lto-streamer-in.cc b/gcc/lto-streamer-in.cc
index 2e592be8082..3e2c786fc36 100644
--- a/gcc/lto-streamer-in.cc
+++ b/gcc/lto-streamer-in.cc
@@ -2013,6 +2013,9 @@ lto_input_mode_table (struct lto_file_decl_data 
*file_data)
                                header->string_size, vNULL);
   bitpack_d bp = streamer_read_bitpack (&ib);
 
+  host_num_poly_int_coeffs
+    = bp_unpack_value (&bp, MAX_NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS_BITS);
+
   unsigned mode_bits = bp_unpack_value (&bp, 5);
   unsigned char *table = ggc_cleared_vec_alloc<unsigned char> (1 << mode_bits);
 
diff --git a/gcc/lto-streamer-out.cc b/gcc/lto-streamer-out.cc
index c329ac8af95..523d6dad221 100644
--- a/gcc/lto-streamer-out.cc
+++ b/gcc/lto-streamer-out.cc
@@ -3192,6 +3192,9 @@ lto_write_mode_table (void)
   ob = create_output_block (LTO_section_mode_table);
   bitpack_d bp = bitpack_create (ob->main_stream);
 
+  if (lto_stream_offload_p)
+    bp_pack_value (&bp, NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS, MAX_NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS_BITS);
+
   /* Ensure that for GET_MODE_INNER (m) != m we have
      also the inner mode marked.  */
   for (int i = 0; i < (int) MAX_MACHINE_MODE; i++)
diff --git a/gcc/poly-int.h b/gcc/poly-int.h
index e3f8d4df716..94708165961 100644
--- a/gcc/poly-int.h
+++ b/gcc/poly-int.h
@@ -354,6 +354,10 @@ struct poly_result<T1, T2, 2>
    ? (void) ((RES).coeffs[I] = VALUE) \
    : (void) ((RES).coeffs[I].~C (), new (&(RES).coeffs[I]) C (VALUE)))
 
+/* Number of bits needed to represent maximum value of
+   NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS defined by any target.  */
+#define MAX_NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS_BITS   2
+
 /* poly_int_full and poly_int_hungry are used internally within poly_int
    for delegated initializers.  poly_int_full indicates that a parameter
    pack has enough elements to initialize every coefficient.  poly_int_hungry
diff --git a/gcc/tree-streamer-in.cc b/gcc/tree-streamer-in.cc
index c248a74f7a1..62200ef2d9d 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-streamer-in.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-streamer-in.cc
@@ -671,8 +671,35 @@ static void
 lto_input_ts_poly_tree_pointers (class lto_input_block *ib,
                                 class data_in *data_in, tree expr)
 {
-  for (unsigned int i = 0; i < NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS; ++i)
-    POLY_INT_CST_COEFF (expr, i) = stream_read_tree_ref (ib, data_in);
+#ifndef ACCEL_COMPILER
+  host_num_poly_int_coeffs = NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS;
+#endif
+
+  /* Ensure that we have streamed-in host_num_poly_int_coeffs.  */
+  gcc_assert (host_num_poly_int_coeffs > 0);
+  unsigned i;
+  if (host_num_poly_int_coeffs <= NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS)
+    {
+      for (i = 0; i < host_num_poly_int_coeffs; i++)
+       POLY_INT_CST_COEFF (expr, i) = stream_read_tree_ref (ib, data_in);
+
+      tree coeff_type = TREE_TYPE (POLY_INT_CST_COEFF (expr, 0));
+      for (; i < NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS; i++)
+       POLY_INT_CST_COEFF (expr, i) = build_zero_cst (coeff_type);
+    }
+  else
+    {
+      for (i = 0; i < NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS; i++)
+       POLY_INT_CST_COEFF (expr, i) = stream_read_tree_ref (ib, data_in);
+      for (; i < host_num_poly_int_coeffs; i++)
+       {
+         tree val = stream_read_tree_ref (ib, data_in);
+         if (!integer_zerop (val))
+           fatal_error (input_location,
+                        "degree of %<poly_int%> exceeds "
+                        "%<NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS%>");
+       }
+    }
 }
 
 

Reply via email to