From: Pierre-Emmanuel Patry <pierre-emmanuel.pa...@embecosm.com>
Values were inserted in the label namespace instead of the value
namespace this lead to several bugs.
gcc/rust/ChangeLog:
* resolve/rust-late-name-resolver-2.0.cc (Late::visit): Change the
namespace for values from "label" to "values".
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Emmanuel Patry <pierre-emmanuel.pa...@embecosm.com>
---
gcc/rust/resolve/rust-late-name-resolver-2.0.cc | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/rust/resolve/rust-late-name-resolver-2.0.cc
b/gcc/rust/resolve/rust-late-name-resolver-2.0.cc
index 5c8d976b417..dc7cde1b323 100644
--- a/gcc/rust/resolve/rust-late-name-resolver-2.0.cc
+++ b/gcc/rust/resolve/rust-late-name-resolver-2.0.cc
@@ -151,7 +151,10 @@ Late::visit (AST::IdentifierPattern &identifier)
// do we insert in labels or in values
// but values does not allow shadowing... since functions cannot shadow
// do we insert functions in labels as well?
- new_label (identifier.get_ident (), identifier.get_node_id ());
+ auto ok
+ = ctx.values.insert (identifier.get_ident (), identifier.get_node_id ());
+
+ rust_assert (ok);
}
void
--
2.45.2
