32bit x86 CPUs won't natively support the FFS operation on a 64 bit
type. Therefore, the switch-exp-transform-3.c test will always fail
with a 32bit target. I'm fixing my mistake.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/i386/switch-exp-transform-3.c: Remove code testing
that the exponential index transform is able to handle long
long int.
Signed-off-by: Filip Kastl <fka...@suse.cz>
---
.../gcc.target/i386/switch-exp-transform-3.c | 51 +------------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/switch-exp-transform-3.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/switch-exp-transform-3.c
index c8fae70692e..cd00071d0bc 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/switch-exp-transform-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/switch-exp-transform-3.c
@@ -4,8 +4,7 @@
/* Checks that the exponential index transformation is done for all these types
of the index variable:
- (unsigned) int
- - (unsigned) long
- - (unsigned) long long */
+ - (unsigned) long */
int unopt_int(int bit_position)
{
@@ -99,50 +98,4 @@ int unopt_unsigned_long(unsigned long bit_position)
}
}
-int unopt_long_long(long long bit_position)
-{
- switch (bit_position)
- {
- case (1 << 0):
- return 0;
- case (1 << 1):
- return 1;
- case (1 << 2):
- return 2;
- case (1 << 3):
- return 3;
- case (1 << 4):
- return 4;
- case (1 << 5):
- return 5;
- case (1 << 6):
- return 6;
- default:
- return 0;
- }
-}
-
-int unopt_unsigned_long_long(unsigned long long bit_position)
-{
- switch (bit_position)
- {
- case (1 << 0):
- return 0;
- case (1 << 1):
- return 1;
- case (1 << 2):
- return 2;
- case (1 << 3):
- return 3;
- case (1 << 4):
- return 4;
- case (1 << 5):
- return 5;
- case (1 << 6):
- return 6;
- default:
- return 0;
- }
-}
-
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Applying exponential index transform" 6
"switchconv" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Applying exponential index transform" 4
"switchconv" } } */
--
2.45.2
