Yeah, OK once your local test passes :)
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 4:38 PM Christoph Müllner
<christoph.muell...@vrull.eu> wrote:
>
> Is it OK to backport to GCC 14 (patch applies cleanly, test is running)?
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 9:25 AM Kito Cheng <kito.ch...@sifive.com> wrote:
> >
> > LGTM :)
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 3:16 PM Christoph Müllner
> > <christoph.muell...@vrull.eu> wrote:
> > >
> > > It is possible that the Zba optimization pattern zero_extendsidi2_bitmanip
> > > matches for a XTheadMemIdx INSN with the effect of emitting an invalid
> > > instruction as reported in PR116035.
> > >
> > > The pattern above is used to emit a zext.w instruction to zero-extend
> > > SI mode registers to DI mode. A similar functionality can be achieved
> > > by XTheadBb's th.extu instruction. And indeed, we have the equivalent
> > > pattern in thead.md (zero_extendsidi2_th_extu). However, that pattern
> > > depends on !TARGET_XTHEADMEMIDX. To compensate for that, there are
> > > specific patterns that ensure that zero-extension instruction can still
> > > be emitted (th_memidx_bb_zero_extendsidi2 and friends).
> > >
> > > While we could implement something similar
> > > (th_memidx_zba_zero_extendsidi2)
> > > it would only make sense, if there existed real HW that does implement Zba
> > > and XTheadMemIdx, but not XTheadBb. Unless such a machine exists, let's
> > > simply disable zero_extendsidi2_bitmanip if XTheadMemIdx is available.
> > >
> > > PR target/116035
> > >
> > > gcc/ChangeLog:
> > >
> > > * config/riscv/bitmanip.md: Disable zero_extendsidi2_bitmanip
> > > for XTheadMemIdx.
> > >
> > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> > >
> > > * gcc.target/riscv/pr116035-1.c: New test.
> > > * gcc.target/riscv/pr116035-2.c: New test.
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Patrick O'Neill <patr...@rivosinc.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muell...@vrull.eu>
> > > ---
> > > gcc/config/riscv/bitmanip.md | 2 +-
> > > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr116035-1.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr116035-2.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr116035-1.c
> > > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr116035-2.c
> > >
> > > diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/bitmanip.md b/gcc/config/riscv/bitmanip.md
> > > index f403ba8dbba..6b720992ca3 100644
> > > --- a/gcc/config/riscv/bitmanip.md
> > > +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/bitmanip.md
> > > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
> > > (define_insn "*zero_extendsidi2_bitmanip"
> > > [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand" "=r,r")
> > > (zero_extend:DI (match_operand:SI 1 "nonimmediate_operand"
> > > "r,m")))]
> > > - "TARGET_64BIT && TARGET_ZBA"
> > > + "TARGET_64BIT && TARGET_ZBA && !TARGET_XTHEADMEMIDX"
> > > "@
> > > zext.w\t%0,%1
> > > lwu\t%0,%1"
> > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr116035-1.c
> > > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr116035-1.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 00000000000..bc45941ff8f
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr116035-1.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> > > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > > +/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-O0" "-O1" "-Og" "-Os" "-Oz" } } */
> > > +/* { dg-options "-march=rv64g_zba_xtheadmemidx" { target { rv64 } } } */
> > > +/* { dg-options "-march=rv32g_zba_xtheadmemidx" { target { rv32 } } } */
> > > +
> > > +void a(long);
> > > +unsigned b[11];
> > > +void c()
> > > +{
> > > + for (int d = 0; d < 11; ++d)
> > > + a(b[d]);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +#if __riscv_xlen == 64
> > > +unsigned long zext64_32(unsigned int u32)
> > > +{
> > > + /* Missed optimization for Zba+XTheadMemIdx. */
> > > + return u32; //zext.w a0, a0
> > > +}
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler
> > > "th.lwuia\t\[a-x0-9\]+,\\(\[a-x0-9\]+\\),4,0" { target rv64 } } } */
> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler
> > > "th.lwia\t\[a-x0-9\]+,\\(\[a-x0-9\]+\\),4,0" { target rv32 } } } */
> > > +
> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not
> > > "lwu\t\[a-x0-9\]+,\(\[a-x0-9\]+\),4,0" } } */
> > > +
> > > +/* Missed optimizations for Zba+XTheadMemIdx. */
> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "zext.w\t" { target rv64 xfail rv64 } } }
> > > */
> > > +
> > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr116035-2.c
> > > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr116035-2.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 00000000000..2c1a9694860
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr116035-2.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> > > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > > +/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-O0" "-O1" "-Og" "-Os" "-Oz" } } */
> > > +/* { dg-options "-march=rv64g_xtheadbb_xtheadmemidx" { target { rv64 } }
> > > } */
> > > +/* { dg-options "-march=rv32g_xtheadbb_xtheadmemidx" { target { rv32 } }
> > > } */
> > > +
> > > +void a(long);
> > > +unsigned b[11];
> > > +void c()
> > > +{
> > > + for (int d = 0; d < 11; ++d)
> > > + a(b[d]);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +#if __riscv_xlen == 64
> > > +unsigned long zext64_32(unsigned int u32)
> > > +{
> > > + return u32; //th.extu a0, a0, 31, 0
> > > +}
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler
> > > "th.lwuia\t\[a-x0-9\]+,\\(\[a-x0-9\]+\\),4,0" { target { rv64 } } } } */
> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler
> > > "th.lwia\t\[a-x0-9\]+,\\(\[a-x0-9\]+\\),4,0" { target { rv32 } } } } */
> > > +
> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not
> > > "lwu\t\[a-x0-9\]+,\\(\[a-x0-9\]+\\),4,0" } } */
> > > +
> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "th.extu\t" { target rv64 } } } */
> > > --
> > > 2.45.2
> > >
