On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 08:42:24AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jul 2024, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > The folding into REALPART_EXPR is correct, used only when the mem_offset > > is zero, but for IMAGPART_EXPR it didn't check the exact offset value (just > > that it is not 0). > > The following patch fixes that by using IMAGPART_EXPR only if the offset > > is right and using BITFIELD_REF or whatever else otherwise. > > > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk, 14.2 > > and other release branches? > > I think this is not enough - what kind of GIMPLE does this result in?
If it is __builtin_memmove (&g, 2 + (char *) &c, 2); then _1 = &c + 2; _3 = MEM <unsigned short> [(char * {ref-all})_1]; is optimized to _3 = IMAGPART_EXPR <c_6(D)>; as before. If it is __builtin_memmove (&g, 1 + (char *) &c, 2); from the testcase, then _1 = &c + 1; _3 = MEM <unsigned short> [(char * {ref-all})_1]; is optimized to _3 = BIT_FIELD_REF <c_6(D), 16, 8>; and that is expanded correctly. > You should amend the checking in non_rewritable_mem_ref_base as well, > it should fail when the corresponding rewrite doesn't work. That is already the case I believe. non_rewritable_mem_ref_base rejects it in the VECTOR_TYPE/COMPLEX_TYPE case (so doesn't return NULL), but then falls through the /* For integral typed extracts we can use a BIT_FIELD_REF. */ check and returns NULL_TREE there. But then maybe_rewrite_mem_ref_base triggers already on the COMPLEX_TYPE case. > I suspect it falls through to the BIT_FIELD_REF code? > > That said, can you match up the offset check with that of > non_rewritable_mem_ref_base then, particularly > > if ((VECTOR_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (decl)) > || TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (decl)) == COMPLEX_TYPE) > && useless_type_conversion_p (TREE_TYPE (base), > TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (decl))) > && known_ge (mem_ref_offset (base), 0) > && known_gt (wi::to_poly_offset (TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (TREE_TYPE > (decl))), > mem_ref_offset (base)) > && multiple_p (mem_ref_offset (base), > wi::to_poly_offset (TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (TREE_TYPE > (base))))) > > I suppose this check should be adjusted to use the three arg multiple_p > and check the factor against 0/1 for COMPLEX_TYPE. Isn't that just too complex/expensive for something as simple as mem_ref_offset (base) is 0 or TYPE_SIZE_UNIT? That integer_zerop () || tree_int_cst_equal looked much cheaper. Sure, it could be done on poly_int_cst instead if that looks better: && (known_eq (mem_ref_offset (base), 0) || known_eq (mem_ref_offset (base), wi::to_poly_offset (TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (TREE_TYPE (decl)))) And shouldn't we cache those mem_ref_offset (base) and wi::to_poly_offset (TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (TREE_TYPE (decl))) which are used in multiple spots? Anyway, yet another option because non_rewritable_mem_ref_base has the VECTOR/COMPLEX types cases together would be to have them together in maybe_rewrite_mem_ref_base too, so do: if ((VECTOR_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (sym)) || TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (sym)) == COMPLEX_TYPE) && useless_type_conversion_p (TREE_TYPE (*tp), TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (sym))) && multiple_p (mem_ref_offset (*tp), wi::to_poly_offset (TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (TREE_TYPE (*tp))))) { if (VECTOR_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (sym))) *tp = build3 (BIT_FIELD_REF, TREE_TYPE (*tp), sym, TYPE_SIZE (TREE_TYPE (*tp)), int_const_binop (MULT_EXPR, bitsize_int (BITS_PER_UNIT), TREE_OPERAND (*tp, 1))); else *tp = build1 (integer_zerop (TREE_OPERAND (*tp, 1)) ? REALPART_EXPR : IMAGPART_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (*tp), sym); } Jakub