> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <h...@axis.com> > Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 05:06:43 +0200
> With r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593, there's a XPASS and a FAIL > for this test-case for cris-elf. Looking at the generated > code, _foo is indeed no longer saved in a register for CRIS. > While that looks like a regression, coremark results are the > same around this revision, so simply adjust the test-case: > remove the target-specific exceptions for cris-*-*. Oh my... That "sameness" was due to fumblefingers on my part. Sorry about that. There is indeed a performance regression at "-O2 -march=v10" for cris-elf for coremark. Not a big one; going from 5179918 to 5181696 cycles gets me 0.034%, but still. Maybe there are other targets affected negatively by r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593, so I opened PR115932 to keep track. brgds, H-P
