On 06/13/2012 01:59 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, rbmj wrote:
Since u?int.*_t are already defined, would this work? Or should I use the
non-typedef'd versions? Also, I'm not exactly sure how to run the regression
tests with a cross compiler. I'm still new to everything, bear with me :-)
You have to use the non-typedef versions, with the keywords in the correct
order - see the documentation of SIZE_TYPE in tm.texi for details.
OK, so I've looked everything over a few times, and I know that these
are in types/vxTypesOld.h, which is not in the arch directory, so it
*should* be architecture independent for vxWorks:
typedef signed char INT8;
typedef signed short INT16;
typedef signed int INT32;
typedef signed long long INT64;
typedef unsigned char UINT8;
typedef unsigned short UINT16;
typedef unsigned int UINT32;
typedef unsigned long long UINT64;
My issue is that I'm uncomfortable with this, as it seems *too* easy.
With the number of architectures vxWorks supports, I'm highly skeptical
that this actually works across all vxWorks targets. Since I only work
with ppc32 targets, perhaps somebody who has knowledge of other vxWorks
ports could confirm or dismiss my fears.
Sorry for the amount of time it has taken me to respond.
Robert
