On 7/8/24 7:47 AM, Nina Dinka Ranns wrote:
HI Jason,

On Fri, 5 Jul 2024 at 17:31, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:

On 7/5/24 10:25 AM, Nina Dinka Ranns wrote:
Certain places in contract parsing currently do not check for errors.
This results in contracts
with embedded errors which eventually confuse gimplify. Checks for
errors added in
grok_contract() and cp_parser_contract_attribute_spec() to exit early
if an error is encountered.

Thanks for the patch!

Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
---

          PR c++/113968

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

          * contracts.cc (grok_contract): Check for error_mark_node early
            exit

These hunks are OK.

          * parser.cc (cp_parser_contract_attribute_spec): Check for
            error_mark_node early exit

This seems redundant, since finish_contract_attribute already checks for
error_mark_node and we're returning its result unchanged.

good catch, removed.


Also, the convention is for wrapped lines in ChangeLog entries to line
up with the *, and to finish sentences with a period.

done.

Tests re-run on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu , no change.

This looks good, but the patch doesn't apply due to word wrap. To avoid that, I tend to use git send-email; sending the patch as an attachment is also OK. Or see

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/email-clients.html

for tips on getting various email clients to leave patches alone.

---
         PR C++/113968

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

         * contracts.cc (grok_contract):  Check for error_mark_node early
         exit.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

         * g++.dg/contracts/pr113968.C: New test.

Signed-off-by: Nina Ranns <dinka.ra...@gmail.com>

---

  gcc/cp/contracts.cc                       |  7 ++++++
  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/contracts/pr113968.C | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/contracts/pr113968.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/contracts.cc b/gcc/cp/contracts.cc
index 634e3cf4fa9..a7d0fdacf6e 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/contracts.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/contracts.cc
@@ -750,6 +750,9 @@ tree
  grok_contract (tree attribute, tree mode, tree result, cp_expr condition,
          location_t loc)
  {
+  if (condition == error_mark_node)
+    return error_mark_node;
+
    tree_code code;
    if (is_attribute_p ("assert", attribute))
      code = ASSERTION_STMT;
@@ -785,6 +788,10 @@ grok_contract (tree attribute, tree mode, tree
result, cp_expr condition,

    /* The condition is converted to bool.  */
    condition = finish_contract_condition (condition);
+
+  if (condition == error_mark_node)
+    return error_mark_node;
+
    CONTRACT_CONDITION (contract) = condition;

    return contract;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/contracts/pr113968.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/contracts/pr113968.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..fbaad1c930d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/contracts/pr113968.C
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+// check that an invalid contract condition doesn't cause an ICE
+// { dg-do compile }
+// { dg-options "-std=c++2a -fcontracts " }
+
+struct A
+{
+  A (A&);
+};
+struct S
+{
+  void f(A a)
+    [[ pre : a]] // { dg-error "could not convert" }
+    [[ pre : a.b]]// { dg-error "has no member" }
+    {
+
+    }
+};
+void f(A a)
+  [[ pre : a]] // { dg-error "could not convert" }
+  [[ pre : a.b]]// { dg-error "has no member" }
+  {
+    [[ assert : a ]]; // { dg-error "could not convert" }
+    [[ assert : a.b ]];// { dg-error "has no member" }
+  }
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+}
--
2.45.2


Reply via email to