On Sat, Jun 22, 2024 at 8:58 PM Andi Kleen <a...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> The musttail error messages are reported to the user, so must be
> translated.
OK.
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * calls.cc (initialize_argument_information): Mark messages
> for translation.
> (can_implement_as_sibling_call_p): Dito.
> (expand_call): Dito.
> ---
> gcc/calls.cc | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/calls.cc b/gcc/calls.cc
> index 883eb9971257..f28c58217fdf 100644
> --- a/gcc/calls.cc
> +++ b/gcc/calls.cc
> @@ -1420,9 +1420,9 @@ initialize_argument_information (int num_actuals
> ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
> {
> *may_tailcall = false;
> maybe_complain_about_tail_call (exp,
> - "a callee-copied argument
> is"
> - " stored in the current"
> - " function's frame");
> + _("a callee-copied argument
> is"
> + " stored in the current"
> + " function's frame"));
> }
>
> args[i].tree_value = build_fold_addr_expr_loc (loc,
> @@ -1489,8 +1489,8 @@ initialize_argument_information (int num_actuals
> ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
> type = TREE_TYPE (args[i].tree_value);
> *may_tailcall = false;
> maybe_complain_about_tail_call (exp,
> - "argument must be passed"
> - " by copying");
> + _("argument must be passed"
> + " by copying"));
> }
> arg.pass_by_reference = true;
> }
> @@ -2508,8 +2508,8 @@ can_implement_as_sibling_call_p (tree exp,
> {
> maybe_complain_about_tail_call
> (exp,
> - "machine description does not have"
> - " a sibcall_epilogue instruction pattern");
> + _("machine description does not have"
> + " a sibcall_epilogue instruction pattern"));
> return false;
> }
>
> @@ -2519,7 +2519,7 @@ can_implement_as_sibling_call_p (tree exp,
> sibling calls will return a structure. */
> if (structure_value_addr != NULL_RTX)
> {
> - maybe_complain_about_tail_call (exp, "callee returns a structure");
> + maybe_complain_about_tail_call (exp, _("callee returns a structure"));
> return false;
> }
>
> @@ -2528,8 +2528,8 @@ can_implement_as_sibling_call_p (tree exp,
> if (!targetm.function_ok_for_sibcall (fndecl, exp))
> {
> maybe_complain_about_tail_call (exp,
> - "target is not able to optimize the"
> - " call into a sibling call");
> + _("target is not able to optimize the"
> + " call into a sibling call"));
> return false;
> }
>
> @@ -2537,18 +2537,18 @@ can_implement_as_sibling_call_p (tree exp,
> optimized. */
> if (flags & ECF_RETURNS_TWICE)
> {
> - maybe_complain_about_tail_call (exp, "callee returns twice");
> + maybe_complain_about_tail_call (exp, _("callee returns twice"));
> return false;
> }
> if (flags & ECF_NORETURN)
> {
> - maybe_complain_about_tail_call (exp, "callee does not return");
> + maybe_complain_about_tail_call (exp, _("callee does not return"));
> return false;
> }
>
> if (TYPE_VOLATILE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (addr))))
> {
> - maybe_complain_about_tail_call (exp, "volatile function type");
> + maybe_complain_about_tail_call (exp, _("volatile function type"));
> return false;
> }
>
> @@ -2567,7 +2567,7 @@ can_implement_as_sibling_call_p (tree exp,
> the argument areas are shared. */
> if (fndecl && decl_function_context (fndecl) == current_function_decl)
> {
> - maybe_complain_about_tail_call (exp, "nested function");
> + maybe_complain_about_tail_call (exp, _("nested function"));
> return false;
> }
>
> @@ -2579,8 +2579,8 @@ can_implement_as_sibling_call_p (tree exp,
> crtl->args.size - crtl->args.pretend_args_size))
> {
> maybe_complain_about_tail_call (exp,
> - "callee required more stack slots"
> - " than the caller");
> + _("callee required more stack slots"
> + " than the caller"));
> return false;
> }
>
> @@ -2594,15 +2594,15 @@ can_implement_as_sibling_call_p (tree exp,
> crtl->args.size)))
> {
> maybe_complain_about_tail_call (exp,
> - "inconsistent number of"
> - " popped arguments");
> + _("inconsistent number of"
> + " popped arguments"));
> return false;
> }
>
> if (!lang_hooks.decls.ok_for_sibcall (fndecl))
> {
> - maybe_complain_about_tail_call (exp, "frontend does not support"
> - " sibling call");
> + maybe_complain_about_tail_call (exp, _("frontend does not support"
> + " sibling call"));
> return false;
> }
>
> @@ -2657,7 +2657,7 @@ expand_call (tree exp, rtx target, int ignore)
> so this shouldn't really happen unless the
> the musttail pass gave up walking before finding the call. */
> if (!try_tail_call)
> - maybe_complain_about_tail_call (exp, "other reasons");
> + maybe_complain_about_tail_call (exp, _("other reasons"));
> int pass;
>
> /* Register in which non-BLKmode value will be returned,
> @@ -3031,7 +3031,7 @@ expand_call (tree exp, rtx target, int ignore)
> there's cleanups, as we know there's code to follow the call. */
> if (currently_expanding_call++ != 0)
> {
> - maybe_complain_about_tail_call (exp, "inside another call");
> + maybe_complain_about_tail_call (exp, _("inside another call"));
> try_tail_call = 0;
> }
> if (!flag_optimize_sibling_calls
> @@ -3040,7 +3040,7 @@ expand_call (tree exp, rtx target, int ignore)
> try_tail_call = 0;
> if (args_size.var)
> {
> - maybe_complain_about_tail_call (exp, "variable size arguments");
> + maybe_complain_about_tail_call (exp, _("variable size arguments"));
> try_tail_call = 0;
> }
> if (dbg_cnt (tail_call) == false)
> @@ -3065,7 +3065,7 @@ expand_call (tree exp, rtx target, int ignore)
> {
> try_tail_call = 0;
> maybe_complain_about_tail_call (exp,
> - "hidden string length argument passed on
> stack");
> + _("hidden string length argument passed on
> stack"));
> break;
> }
> }
> @@ -3113,9 +3113,9 @@ expand_call (tree exp, rtx target, int ignore)
> {
> try_tail_call = 0;
> maybe_complain_about_tail_call (exp,
> - "caller and callee disagree in"
> - " promotion of function"
> - " return value");
> + _("caller and callee disagree in"
> + " promotion of function"
> + " return value"));
> }
> }
>
> @@ -4025,7 +4025,7 @@ expand_call (tree exp, rtx target, int ignore)
> if (try_tail_call)
> /* Ideally we'd emit a message for all of the ways that it could
> have failed. */
> - maybe_complain_about_tail_call (exp, "tail call production failed");
> + maybe_complain_about_tail_call (exp, _("tail call production
> failed"));
> }
>
> currently_expanding_call--;
> --
> 2.45.2
>
