On 6/16/24 9:40 PM, Kewen.Lin wrote: > on 2024/6/17 10:31, Peter Bergner wrote: >> On 6/16/24 9:10 PM, Kewen.Lin wrote: >>> on 2024/6/15 01:05, Peter Bergner wrote: >>>> That said, the --with-cpu=power5 build without fortran did bootstrap and >>>> regtest with no regressions, so the build did test that code path and >>>> exposed no problems. >>> >>> OK, nice! Thanks! >> >> I assume this means you're "OK" with the updated patch, correct? > > Yes, OK for trunk, thanks!
Thanks. We will need backports to GCC 11, as it is broken back to when ROP was first added then. I'll let things burn-in on trunk for a couple of days so Bill's CI builders have a chance to test it on all of our configs. >> Do you want to take a stab at writing that or do you want me to do that? > > Either is fine for me, then let me give it a shot. Sounds good, thanks. That will allow me to handle the other ROP issues I came across, which are reported in PR114759. Peter
