The patch fails on arm because the tests make assumptions about enums that are not true everywhere. Should we just limit the tests to x86?
Martin Am Montag, dem 03.06.2024 um 17:37 +0000 schrieb Joseph Myers: > On Sat, 1 Jun 2024, Martin Uecker wrote: > > > This is a new version of the patch. I changed the overflow warning to > > an error and added your other example to the test case. > > > > Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64. > > > > > > c23: Fix for redeclared enumerator initialized with different type > > [PR115109] > > > > c23 specifies that the type of a redeclared enumerator is the one of the > > previous declaration. Convert initializers with different type > > accordingly > > and emit an error when the value does not fit. > > > > 2024-06-01 Martin Uecker <uec...@tugraz.at> > > > > PR c/115109 > > > > gcc/c/ > > * c-decl.cc (build_enumerator): When redeclaring an > > enumerator convert value to previous type. For redeclared > > enumerators use underlying type for computing the next value. > > > > gcc/testsuite/ > > * gcc.dg/pr115109.c: New test. > > * gcc.dg/c23-tag-enum-6.c: New test. > > * gcc.dg/c23-tag-enum-7.c: New test. > > OK. >
