Hi Jonathan, Richard,

On 12.06.24 20:54, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 12/06/24 16:09 +0200, Frank Scheiner wrote:
Dear Richard,

On 12.06.24 13:01, Richard Biener wrote:
[...]
I can find two gcc-testresult postings, one appearantly with LRA
and one without?  Both from May:

https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2024-May/816422.html
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2024-May/816346.html

somehow for example libstdc++ summaries were not merged, it might
be you do not have recent python installed on the system?  Or you
didn't use contrib/test_summary to create those mails.

No, I did not use contrib/test_summary. But I still have tarballs of
both testsuite runs, so could still produce these summaries - I hope?

It looks like the results at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2024-May/816422.html are
just what's printed on standard out, including output from 'make -j4'
so not combined into one set of results.

That's what it is, yes.

It would certainly be better to either get the results from the .sum
files, or just use the contrib/test_summary script to do that for you.

Ok, I posted the results as created by contrib/test_summary now:

1. non-LRA version on [1]

2. LRA version on [2]

[1]: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2024-June/817267.html

[2]: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2024-June/817268.html

The difference 2 compared to 1 is attached.

Do I need to run this on the host that did the testing or can I run it
on my NFS server where the tarballs are actually located, too?

I don't think the script cares where it's run, it just looks at text
files which should work on any host.

It looks like it worked fine. :-)

Cheers,
Frank
diff --git a/gcc-15-testsuite-summary.log b/gcc-15-lra-testsuite-summary.log
index b7acc04..558079a 100644
--- a/gcc-15-testsuite-summary.log
+++ b/gcc-15-lra-testsuite-summary.log
@@ -306,13 +306,12 @@ FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/csttest.c  -Og -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  line 55 q == -(0x1ef
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/csttest.c  -Og -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  line 55 r == -(0x1efULL << 50)
 XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/example.c   -O0  execution test
 XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/guality.c   -O0  execution test
-XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/guality.c   -O3 -g  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params-2.c   -O1  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params-2.c   -O2  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
+FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params-2.c   -O3 -g  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params-2.c   -Os  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params-2.c  -Og -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c   -O1  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
-XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c   -O3 -g  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c  -Og -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/ipa-sra-1.c   -O1  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  line 19 k == 3
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/ipa-sra-1.c   -O1  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  line 31 k == 3
@@ -434,6 +433,7 @@ FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c   -Os  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c  -Og -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c   -O1  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c   -O2  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
+FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c   -O3 -g  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c  -Og -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43051-1.c   -Os  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  line 34 c == &a[0]
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43077-1.c   -O0  line 19 vara == 1
@@ -798,10 +798,10 @@ FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/crossmodule-indircall-1a.c compilation,  -fprofile-genera
 UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/crossmodule-indircall-1a.c compilation,  -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
 UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/crossmodule-indircall-1a.c execution,    -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE
 UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/crossmodule-indircall-1a.c execution,    -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
-FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr77698.c compilation,  -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE
-UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr77698.c compilation,  -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
-UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr77698.c execution,    -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE
-UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr77698.c execution,    -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr47187.c compilation,  -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr47187.c compilation,  -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr47187.c execution,    -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr47187.c execution,    -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/abs-4.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "= -" 3
 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/abs-4.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "= ABS_EXPR" 3
 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/asm-2.c (test for excess errors)
@@ -953,18 +953,21 @@ FAIL: gcc.target/ia64/pr49303.c (test for excess errors)
 
 		=== gcc Summary ===
 
-# of expected passes		134719
-# of unexpected failures	899
-# of unexpected successes	21
-# of expected failures		1362
+# of expected passes		134769
+# of unexpected failures	901
+# of unexpected successes	19
+# of expected failures		1364
 # of unresolved testcases	23
-# of unsupported tests		3081
-/dev/shm/gcc-15/src.gcc.ia64-toolchain-3.240529.112623.549077/gcc/gcc.build.lnx/gcc/xgcc  version 15.0.0 20240528 (experimental) (GCC) 
+# of unsupported tests		3036
+/dev/shm/gcc-15-lra/src.gcc.ia64-toolchain-3.240529.123346.921189/gcc/gcc.build.lnx/gcc/xgcc  version 15.0.0 20240528 (experimental) (GCC) 
 
 		=== gfortran tests ===
 
 
 Running target unix
+FAIL: gfortran.dg/default_initialization_3.f90   -O3 -g  (internal compiler error: in create_block_for_bookkeeping, at sel-sched.cc:4557)
+FAIL: gfortran.dg/default_initialization_3.f90   -O3 -g  (test for excess errors)
+UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/default_initialization_3.f90   -O3 -g  compilation failed to produce executable
 FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90   -O   (test for errors, line 6)
 FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90   -O  (test for excess errors)
 FAIL: gfortran.dg/guality/arg1.f90   -O1  line 14 a(10) == 10
@@ -978,11 +981,12 @@ FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-2.f90   -O   scan-tree-dump-times vect "Alignment of
 
 		=== gfortran Summary ===
 
-# of expected passes		69618
-# of unexpected failures	10
+# of expected passes		69616
+# of unexpected failures	12
 # of expected failures		273
+# of unresolved testcases	1
 # of unsupported tests		168
-/dev/shm/gcc-15/src.gcc.ia64-toolchain-3.240529.112623.549077/gcc/gcc.build.lnx/gcc/gfortran  version 15.0.0 20240528 (experimental) (GCC) 
+/dev/shm/gcc-15-lra/src.gcc.ia64-toolchain-3.240529.123346.921189/gcc/gcc.build.lnx/gcc/gfortran  version 15.0.0 20240528 (experimental) (GCC) 
 
 		=== g++ tests ===
 
@@ -1201,7 +1205,7 @@ FAIL: g++.dg/tree-prof/pr35545.C scan-tree-dump-not optimized "OBJ_TYPE_REF"
 # of expected failures		2595
 # of unresolved testcases	5
 # of unsupported tests		11542
-/dev/shm/gcc-15/src.gcc.ia64-toolchain-3.240529.112623.549077/gcc/gcc.build.lnx/gcc/xg++  version 15.0.0 20240528 (experimental) (GCC) 
+/dev/shm/gcc-15-lra/src.gcc.ia64-toolchain-3.240529.123346.921189/gcc/gcc.build.lnx/gcc/xg++  version 15.0.0 20240528 (experimental) (GCC) 
 
 		=== objc tests ===
 
@@ -1212,7 +1216,7 @@ Running target unix
 
 # of expected passes		2778
 # of unsupported tests		58
-/dev/shm/gcc-15/src.gcc.ia64-toolchain-3.240529.112623.549077/gcc/gcc.build.lnx/gcc/xgcc  version 15.0.0 20240528 (experimental) (GCC) 
+/dev/shm/gcc-15-lra/src.gcc.ia64-toolchain-3.240529.123346.921189/gcc/gcc.build.lnx/gcc/xgcc  version 15.0.0 20240528 (experimental) (GCC) 
 
 		=== libatomic tests ===
 

Reply via email to