[PATCH] testsuite: Fix pr66144-3.c test to accept multiple equivalent insns. [PR115262]

[Peter Bergner]

testsuite: Fix pr66144-3.c test to accept multiple equivalent insns. [PR115262]

Jeff's commit r15-831-g05daf617ea22e1 changed the instruction we expected
for this test case into an equivalent instruction.  Modify the test case
so it will accept any of three equivalent instructions we could get depending
on the options used.

I've verified this test case PASSes on all scenarios where the three possible
instructions are generated.  Ok for trunk?

Peter


2024-06-12  Peter Bergner  <berg...@linux.ibm.com>

gcc/testsuite/
        PR testsuite/115262
        * gcc.target/powerpc/pr66144-3.c: Add -fno-unroll-loops to options.
        (scan-assembler): Change from this...
        (scan-assembler-times): ...to this.  Tweak regex to accept multiple
        equivalent instructions.


diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr66144-3.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr66144-3.c
index 4c93b2a7a3d..dbd746c5489 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr66144-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr66144-3.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-do compile { target { powerpc64*-*-* } } } */
-/* { dg-options "-mdejagnu-cpu=power8 -mvsx -O2 -ftree-vectorize" } */
+/* { dg-options "-mdejagnu-cpu=power8 -mvsx -O2 -ftree-vectorize 
-fno-unroll-loops" } */
 /* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_vsx } */
 
 /* Verify that we can optimize a vector conditional move, where one of the arms
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ test (void)
     a[i] = (b[i] == c[i]) ? -1 : a[i];
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler     {\mvcmpequw\M} } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler     {\mxxsel\M}    } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mvcmpequw\M} 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\m(?:xxsel|xxlor|vor)\M} 1 } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mvspltisw\M} } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mxxlorc\M}   } } */