On 6/8/24 1:53 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:


I realise there are many ways of writing this out there though,
so that's just a suggestion.  (And only lightly tested.)

FWIW, we could easily extend the interface to work on wide_ints if we
ever need it for N>63.
I think there's constraints elsewhere that keep us in the N<=63 range. If we extended things elsewhere to include TI then we could fully support 64bit CRCs.

I don't *think* it's that hard, but we haven't actually tried.

Jeff


Reply via email to