Hi,

on 2024/5/30 00:06, Carl Love wrote:
> This was patch 8 in the previous series.  Updated patch per the feedback 
> comments.
> 
>                             Carl 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> rs6000, remove __builtin_vsx_vperm_* built-ins
> 
> The undocumented built-ins:
>   __builtin_vsx_vperm_16qi_uns,
>   __builtin_vsx_vperm_1ti,
>   __builtin_vsx_vperm_1ti_uns,
>   __builtin_vsx_vperm_2df,
>   __builtin_vsx_vperm_2di,
>   __builtin_vsx_vperm_2di_uns,
>   __builtin_vsx_vperm_4sf,
>   __builtin_vsx_vperm_4si,
>   __builtin_vsx_vperm_4si_uns
> 
> are duplicats of the __builtin_altivec_* builtins that are used by
> the overloaded vec_perm built-in that is documented in the PVIPR.

OK for trunk, thanks!

BR,
Kewen

> 
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>       * config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def (__builtin_vsx_vperm_16qi_uns,
>       __builtin_vsx_vperm_1ti, __builtin_vsx_vperm_1ti_uns,
>       __builtin_vsx_vperm_2df, __builtin_vsx_vperm_2di,
>       __builtin_vsx_vperm_2di_uns, __builtin_vsx_vperm_4sf,
>       __builtin_vsx_vperm_4si, __builtin_vsx_vperm_4si_uns): Remove
>       built-in definitions and comments.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>       * gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-builtin-3.c (__builtin_vsx_vperm_16qi_uns,
>       __builtin_vsx_vperm_1ti, __builtin_vsx_vperm_1ti_uns,
>       __builtin_vsx_vperm_2df, __builtin_vsx_vperm_2di,
>       __builtin_vsx_vperm_2di_uns, __builtin_vsx_vperm_4sf,
>       __builtin_vsx_vperm_4si, __builtin_vsx_vperm_4si_uns,
>       __builtin_vsx_vperm): Change call to built-in to the  overloaded
>       built-in vec_perm.
> ---
>  gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def         | 33 -------------------
>  .../gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-builtin-3.c        | 22 ++++++-------
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def 
> b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
> index a78c52183bc..f02a8c4de45 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
> @@ -1529,39 +1529,6 @@
>    const vf __builtin_vsx_uns_floato_v2di (vsll);
>      UNS_FLOATO_V2DI unsfloatov2di {}
>  
> -; These are duplicates of __builtin_altivec_* counterparts, and are being
> -; kept for backwards compatibility.  The reason for their existence is
> -; unclear.  TODO: Consider deprecation/removal at some point.
> -  const vsc __builtin_vsx_vperm_16qi (vsc, vsc, vuc);
> -    VPERM_16QI_X altivec_vperm_v16qi {}
> -
> -  const vuc __builtin_vsx_vperm_16qi_uns (vuc, vuc, vuc);
> -    VPERM_16QI_UNS_X altivec_vperm_v16qi_uns {}
> -
> -  const vsq __builtin_vsx_vperm_1ti (vsq, vsq, vsc);
> -    VPERM_1TI_X altivec_vperm_v1ti {}
> -
> -  const vsq __builtin_vsx_vperm_1ti_uns (vsq, vsq, vsc);
> -    VPERM_1TI_UNS_X altivec_vperm_v1ti_uns {}
> -
> -  const vd __builtin_vsx_vperm_2df (vd, vd, vuc);
> -    VPERM_2DF_X altivec_vperm_v2df {}
> -
> -  const vsll __builtin_vsx_vperm_2di (vsll, vsll, vuc);
> -    VPERM_2DI_X altivec_vperm_v2di {}
> -
> -  const vull __builtin_vsx_vperm_2di_uns (vull, vull, vuc);
> -    VPERM_2DI_UNS_X altivec_vperm_v2di_uns {}
> -
> -  const vf __builtin_vsx_vperm_4sf (vf, vf, vuc);
> -    VPERM_4SF_X altivec_vperm_v4sf {}
> -
> -  const vsi __builtin_vsx_vperm_4si (vsi, vsi, vuc);
> -    VPERM_4SI_X altivec_vperm_v4si {}
> -
> -  const vui __builtin_vsx_vperm_4si_uns (vui, vui, vuc);
> -    VPERM_4SI_UNS_X altivec_vperm_v4si_uns {}
> -
>    const vss __builtin_vsx_vperm_8hi (vss, vss, vuc);
>      VPERM_8HI_X altivec_vperm_v8hi {}
>  
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-builtin-3.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-builtin-3.c
> index e20d3f03c86..f06d871b6b1 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-builtin-3.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-builtin-3.c
> @@ -88,17 +88,17 @@ int do_perm(void)
>  {
>    int i = 0;
>  
> -  si[i][0] = __builtin_vsx_vperm_4si (si[i][1], si[i][2], uc[i][3]); i++;
> -  ss[i][0] = __builtin_vsx_vperm_8hi (ss[i][1], ss[i][2], uc[i][3]); i++;
> -  sc[i][0] = __builtin_vsx_vperm_16qi (sc[i][1], sc[i][2], uc[i][3]); i++;
> -  f[i][0] = __builtin_vsx_vperm_4sf (f[i][1], f[i][2], uc[i][3]); i++;
> -  d[i][0] = __builtin_vsx_vperm_2df (d[i][1], d[i][2], uc[i][3]); i++;
> -
> -  si[i][0] = __builtin_vsx_vperm (si[i][1], si[i][2], uc[i][3]); i++;
> -  ss[i][0] = __builtin_vsx_vperm (ss[i][1], ss[i][2], uc[i][3]); i++;
> -  sc[i][0] = __builtin_vsx_vperm (sc[i][1], sc[i][2], uc[i][3]); i++;
> -  f[i][0] = __builtin_vsx_vperm (f[i][1], f[i][2], uc[i][3]); i++;
> -  d[i][0] = __builtin_vsx_vperm (d[i][1], d[i][2], uc[i][3]); i++;
> +  si[i][0] = vec_perm (si[i][1], si[i][2], uc[i][3]); i++;
> +  ss[i][0] = vec_perm (ss[i][1], ss[i][2], uc[i][3]); i++;
> +  sc[i][0] = vec_perm (sc[i][1], sc[i][2], uc[i][3]); i++;
> +  f[i][0] = vec_perm (f[i][1], f[i][2], uc[i][3]); i++;
> +  d[i][0] = vec_perm (d[i][1], d[i][2], uc[i][3]); i++;
> +
> +  si[i][0] = vec_perm (si[i][1], si[i][2], uc[i][3]); i++;
> +  ss[i][0] = vec_perm (ss[i][1], ss[i][2], uc[i][3]); i++;
> +  sc[i][0] = vec_perm (sc[i][1], sc[i][2], uc[i][3]); i++;
> +  f[i][0] = vec_perm (f[i][1], f[i][2], uc[i][3]); i++;
> +  d[i][0] = vec_perm (d[i][1], d[i][2], uc[i][3]); i++;
>  
>    return i;
>  }

Reply via email to