Hi,
  This patch implemented optab_isinf for SFDF and IEEE128 by test
data class instructions.

  Compared with previous version, the main change is to narrow
down the predict for float operand according to review's advice.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-May/652128.html

  Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64-linux BE and LE with no
regressions. Is it OK for trunk?

Thanks
Gui Haochen

ChangeLog
rs6000: Implement optab_isinf for SFDF and IEEE128

gcc/
        PR target/97786
        * config/rs6000/vsx.md (isinf<mode>2 for SFDF): New expand.
        (isinf<mode>2 for IEEE128): New expand.

gcc/testsuite/
        PR target/97786
        * gcc.target/powerpc/pr97786-1.c: New test.
        * gcc.target/powerpc/pr97786-2.c: New test.

patch.diff
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md b/gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md
index f135fa079bd..08cce11da60 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md
@@ -5313,6 +5313,24 @@ (define_expand "xststdc<sd>p"
   operands[4] = CONST0_RTX (SImode);
 })

+(define_expand "isinf<mode>2"
+  [(use (match_operand:SI 0 "gpc_reg_operand"))
+   (use (match_operand:SFDF 1 "vsx_register_operand"))]
+  "TARGET_HARD_FLOAT && TARGET_P9_VECTOR"
+{
+  emit_insn (gen_xststdc<sd>p (operands[0], operands[1], GEN_INT (0x30)));
+  DONE;
+})
+
+(define_expand "isinf<mode>2"
+  [(use (match_operand:SI 0 "gpc_reg_operand"))
+   (use (match_operand:IEEE128 1 "vsx_register_operand"))]
+  "TARGET_HARD_FLOAT && TARGET_P9_VECTOR"
+{
+  emit_insn (gen_xststdcqp_<mode> (operands[0], operands[1], GEN_INT (0x30)));
+  DONE;
+})
+
 ;; The VSX Scalar Test Negative Quad-Precision
 (define_expand "xststdcnegqp_<mode>"
   [(set (match_dup 2)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr97786-1.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr97786-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c1c4f64ee8b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr97786-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_vsx } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -mdejagnu-cpu=power9" } */
+
+int test1 (double x)
+{
+  return __builtin_isinf (x);
+}
+
+int test2 (float x)
+{
+  return __builtin_isinf (x);
+}
+
+int test3 (float x)
+{
+  return __builtin_isinff (x);
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mfcmp} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mxststdcsp\M} 2 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mxststdcdp\M} 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr97786-2.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr97786-2.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ed305e8572e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr97786-2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target ppc_float128_hw } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_vsx } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -mdejagnu-cpu=power9 -mabi=ieeelongdouble -Wno-psabi" } */
+
+int test1 (long double x)
+{
+  return __builtin_isinf (x);
+}
+
+int test2 (long double x)
+{
+  return __builtin_isinfl (x);
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mxscmpuqp\M} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mxststdcqp\M} 2 } } */

Reply via email to