On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 05:05:30PM +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> > --- gcc/gcc.cc.jj 2024-02-09 14:54:09.141489744 +0100
> > +++ gcc/gcc.cc 2024-02-09 22:04:37.655678742 +0100
> > @@ -2410,8 +2410,7 @@ read_specs (const char *filename, bool m
> > if (*p1++ != '<' || p[-2] != '>')
> > fatal_error (input_location,
> > "specs %%include syntax malformed after "
> > - "%ld characters",
> > - (long) (p1 - buffer + 1));
> > + "%td characters", p1 - buffer + 1);
> >
>
> Should we use %td later for gcc itself? Since we may use older
> compiler to build gcc.
> My major workstation is Debian Bookworm, which has GCC 12, and then I
> get some warnings:
That is fine and expected. During stage1 such warnings are intentionally
not fatal, only in stage2+ when we know it is the same version of gcc
we want those can be fatal.
Otherwise we could never add any new modifies...
Jakub
