Re: RFA: better gimplification of compound literals

[Jan Hubicka]

> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Michael Matz wrote:
> 
> > In any case, this patch is currently in regstrapping on x86-64.  Okay if 
> > it passes (modulo changes for the above symtab_get_node() issue)?
> 
> After discussion with Honza, consider the patch changed like so:
> 
>    if (!from_decl
>        || TREE_CODE (from_decl) != VAR_DECL
>        || !DECL_EXTERNAL (from_decl)
> -      || (symtab_get_node (from_decl)->symbol.in_other_partition))
> +      || (flag_ltrans
> +         && symtab_get_node (from_decl)->symbol.in_other_partition))
>      return true;
> 
> Restarted regstrapping the thing on x86_64 again.  Okay if that passes?

This change is fine with me ;)

Thanks,
Honza
> 
> 
> Ciao,
> Michael.