Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> 于2024年5月16日周四 15:05写道:

>
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 8:25 AM Hongyu Wang <hongyu.w...@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > In ix86_override_options_after_change, calls to ix86_default_align
> > and ix86_recompute_optlev_based_flags will cause mismatched target
> > opt_set when doing cl_optimization_restore. Move them back to
> > ix86_option_override_internal to solve the issue.
> >
> > Bootstrapped & regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, and Rainer helped to
> > test with i386-pc-solaris2.11 which also passed 32/64bit tests.
>
> Since this is a tricky area apparently without too much test coverage can
> we have a testcase for this?

This is a fix for my previous change on PR 107692, which moved these 2
functions to ix86_override_options_after_change and it caused the
PR113719 regression. The PR103696 test is the one that expose the
issue. Actually the previous change will cause these 2 function be
called in cl_optimization_restore
which is redundant and incorrect. I cannot find another test to expose
other functional regressions.

>
> > Ok for trunk and backport down to gcc12?
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> >         PR target/113719
> >         * config/i386/i386-options.cc (ix86_override_options_after_change):
> >         Remove call to ix86_default_align and
> >         ix86_recompute_optlev_based_flags.
> >         (ix86_option_override_internal): Call ix86_default_align and
> >         ix86_recompute_optlev_based_flags.
> > ---
> >  gcc/config/i386/i386-options.cc | 10 +++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-options.cc 
> > b/gcc/config/i386/i386-options.cc
> > index ac48b5c61c4..d97464f2c74 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-options.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-options.cc
> > @@ -1930,11 +1930,6 @@ ix86_recompute_optlev_based_flags (struct 
> > gcc_options *opts,
> >  void
> >  ix86_override_options_after_change (void)
> >  {
> > -  /* Default align_* from the processor table.  */
> > -  ix86_default_align (&global_options);
> > -
> > -  ix86_recompute_optlev_based_flags (&global_options, &global_options_set);
> > -
> >    /* Disable unrolling small loops when there's explicit
> >       -f{,no}unroll-loop.  */
> >    if ((OPTION_SET_P (flag_unroll_loops))
> > @@ -2530,6 +2525,8 @@ ix86_option_override_internal (bool main_args_p,
> >
> >    set_ix86_tune_features (opts, ix86_tune, opts->x_ix86_dump_tunes);
> >
> > +  ix86_recompute_optlev_based_flags (opts, opts_set);
> > +
> >    ix86_override_options_after_change ();
> >
> >    ix86_tune_cost = processor_cost_table[ix86_tune];
> > @@ -2565,6 +2562,9 @@ ix86_option_override_internal (bool main_args_p,
> >        || TARGET_64BIT_P (opts->x_ix86_isa_flags))
> >      opts->x_ix86_regparm = REGPARM_MAX;
> >
> > +  /* Default align_* from the processor table.  */
> > +  ix86_default_align (&global_options);
> > +
> >    /* Provide default for -mbranch-cost= value.  */
> >    SET_OPTION_IF_UNSET (opts, opts_set, ix86_branch_cost,
> >                        ix86_tune_cost->branch_cost);
> > --
> > 2.31.1
> >

Reply via email to