On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 21:15:09 +0000, Joseph Myers wrote: > That can't be right. The GCC %q is a modifier that needs to have an > actual format specifier it modifies (so %qs - which produces the same > output as %<%s%> - but not %q by itself).
Yes, I got CI results of failure and noticed that I had prepared the patches on my laptop, but when I investigated, I had done additional work on my desktop concurrently I had not pulled back (it builds GCC in a…reasonable time comparatively) which did have the `%qs` change, but I've not gotten around to running the test suite again (or reporting back here). I have another patch revision in the works. Thanks, --Ben
