Hi Gaius,
> yes this looks good to me please apply. Thanks for the rationale
done for trunk. I guess it's ok to apply to the gcc-14 branch after the
release and some soak time?
> described in the PR. As suggested, locally changing site.exp is more
> appropriate should the need arise. The dg-timeout code was added to
> speed up testing/development of (a deadlocking) RTco.cc (which has
> since been fixed)
Sure: while I've used increased global timeouts in the distant past
(IRIX, old and slow SPARC boxes), it certainly works both ways.
Thanks.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
